Landau Energy Spectrum in the non-relativistic limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Landau Energy Spectrum in the non-relativistic limit, specifically addressing the conditions where mass (m) is significantly greater than momentum (p) and frequency (w). It establishes that under these conditions, the energy can be expressed as E = m + w(n + 1/2) through a Taylor expansion of the square root function. The conversation highlights a critical point of confusion regarding the transformation of mass into the kinetic energy term p²/2m, emphasizing the importance of not prematurely setting p to zero in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-relativistic quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions
  • Knowledge of the Landau levels and energy quantization
  • Basic concepts of momentum and energy relations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the Landau levels in quantum mechanics
  • Study the implications of the non-relativistic limit in particle physics
  • Learn about Taylor series and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the Landau Energy Spectrum and its implications in non-relativistic systems.

desperate_student
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In the relativistic landau energy spectrum for a particle in a magnetic field, how does the m^2 term simplify down to p^2/2m in the non-relativistic limit?
Relevant Equations
Non-Relativistic: E=p^2/2m +w(n+1/2), n=0,1,2....
Relativistic: E= sqrt(p^2 +m^2+2mw(n+1/2)) n=0,1,2....
At non-relativistic limit, m>>p so let p=0
At non-relativistic limit m>>w,
So factorise out m^2 from the square root to get:
m*sqrt(1+2w(n+1/2)/m)
Taylor expansion identity for sqrt(1+x) for small x gives:
E=m+w(n+1/2) but it should equal E=p^2/2m +w(n+1/2), so how does m transform into p^2/2m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
desperate_student said:
At non-relativistic limit, m>>p so let p=0
If you set p=0, it should be obvious that you will not get an equation that depends on p. So try it again without doing that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
655
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K