Landau Energy Spectrum in the non-relativistic limit

Click For Summary
In the non-relativistic limit, the relationship between mass (m), momentum (p), and energy (E) is explored, highlighting that m is significantly greater than both p and the angular frequency (w). By factoring out m^2 from the square root, the energy expression simplifies to E = m + w(n + 1/2). However, this leads to a discrepancy with the expected form E = p^2/2m + w(n + 1/2). The discussion emphasizes the importance of not setting p to zero prematurely, as it obscures the dependency on momentum. Understanding these transformations is crucial for accurately deriving energy expressions in quantum mechanics.
desperate_student
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In the relativistic landau energy spectrum for a particle in a magnetic field, how does the m^2 term simplify down to p^2/2m in the non-relativistic limit?
Relevant Equations
Non-Relativistic: E=p^2/2m +w(n+1/2), n=0,1,2....
Relativistic: E= sqrt(p^2 +m^2+2mw(n+1/2)) n=0,1,2....
At non-relativistic limit, m>>p so let p=0
At non-relativistic limit m>>w,
So factorise out m^2 from the square root to get:
m*sqrt(1+2w(n+1/2)/m)
Taylor expansion identity for sqrt(1+x) for small x gives:
E=m+w(n+1/2) but it should equal E=p^2/2m +w(n+1/2), so how does m transform into p^2/2m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
desperate_student said:
At non-relativistic limit, m>>p so let p=0
If you set p=0, it should be obvious that you will not get an equation that depends on p. So try it again without doing that.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...