Lanolin Molecules: Why Wool Fat is Composed of 200+ Molecules

  • Thread starter Thread starter ovacs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the composition of lanolin, a substance derived from wool fat, which is said to consist of over 200 different molecules. Participants explore the reasons behind this diversity, questioning whether there is a general principle in nature that dictates the production of such molecules and their purposes in organic bodies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about references explaining why wool fat contains over 200 different molecules and whether there is a natural law guiding this diversity.
  • Another participant argues that organic bodies do not have purpose-driven chemical reactions, suggesting that the presence of various molecules is a result of evolutionary processes rather than intentional design.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that traits in organisms, including those that may seem unnecessary, persist because they do not hinder survival, rather than being strictly beneficial.
  • A later post introduces the idea that some lanolin molecules might exhibit photosynthetic features, proposing that they could play a role in regulating temperature for the animal, although this remains speculative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the purpose and origin of the molecules in lanolin, with no consensus reached regarding whether there is a guiding principle in nature for their diversity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about evolutionary biology and the nature of organic chemistry that may not be universally accepted or fully explored.

ovacs
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Is there anywhere a reference to get an idea, why wool fat consists of over 200 different molecules?

Is there some sort of a general law or ruling, like the Darwin's evolution, that nature produces nothing more and nothing less as what is required for the propose?

If so, how is such a diversity of molecules produced in organic body and for what propose(s)?

Thanks for looking.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
This is worded to reflect your approach to your question.

There are many more than 200 molecules in a single cell in your hand.

Organic bodies do not have purpose-driven chemical reactions. Organic bodies are following a blueprint in the genetic material. There is no defined purpose or pre-thought behind it. Humans assign meaning and purpose there because we work that way mentally. You assign meaning. Sheep epidermal glands secrete a given molecule (pick one) because somewhere long ago some sheep ancestral animals that secreted molecule A did better and had more baby animals than the beasties that secreted molecule B.

Those conditions that favored molecule A may not even exist today but the sheep's oil glands still produce molecule A. Along with all of the others.

Mammals secrete sebum (skin oils) - Human sebum, secreted by sebaceous glands mostly on the face, is composed of:
triglycerides, wax esters like squalene and various sloughed off cellular materials. Sebum can break down because of skin bacterial action, creating even more compounds. So. Sheep are mammals just like us.
 
ovacs said:
Is there some sort of a general law or ruling, like the Darwin's evolution, that nature produces nothing more and nothing less as what is required for the propose?

That's a misconception that perhaps we can clear up for you. What remains in the genome and continues to be expressed phenotypically are not just traits that aid survival, but traits that don't interfere with survival. The reason that people continue to be born with poor eyesight, appendixes, and wisdom teeth is that we've found work-arounds to these pesky issues. If we weren't so stinkin' smart, these inconveniences would have probably been selected out a long time ago.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_vestigiality

Granted, parsimony is a welcomed friend of natural selection, but what sticks around is what works, whether it's a sloppy fix or a parsimonious one.
 
Lanolin and Energy

Thanks for your contributions. Why have i come up with the question of propose of these lanolin molecules? There are some signs as energetic measurements, that these fat molecules may have photosynthetic features. Remember the day-night cycle of photosynthesis involving CO2 and H2O, accompanied with energy consumption and release based on glucose for instance. This would give them not only a meaningful propose as cooling the animal skin during the day and warming it in the night. Is such a cycle possible based on the molecules involved?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
20K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K