MHB Laplace Convolution: f(t)=-5t^2+9

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Laplace convolution of the function f(t) = -5t^2 + 9, which involves integrating f(t-u) multiplied by sin(9u). The Laplace transform of f(t) is expressed as F(s), leading to the equation F(s) = -5(2/s^3) + 9F(s)(9/(s^2 + 81)). Participants express interest in the implications of this equation, particularly how the quadratic function interacts with the integral. The conversation seeks further clarification on the nature of f(t) and its relationship to the integral component. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical intricacies of the Laplace transform and convolution.
Alex2124
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
f(t)=-5t^2+9\int_{0}^{t} \,f(t-u)sin(9u)du
 

Attachments

  • Annotation 2020-03-20 152518.png
    Annotation 2020-03-20 152518.png
    3 KB · Views: 158
Physics news on Phys.org
Alex2124 said:
f(t)=-5t^2+9\int_{0}^{t} \,f(t-u)sin(9u)du

$\displaystyle \mathcal{L} \left\{ f\left( t \right) \right\} = F\left( s \right) $, so

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{L} \left\{ f\left( t \right) \right\} &= \mathcal{L}\left\{ -5\,t^2 \right\} + 9\,\mathcal{L}\left\{ \int_0^t{ f\left( t - u \right) \,\sin{\left( 9\,u \right) } \,\mathrm{d}u } \right\} \\
F\left( s \right) &= -5 \left( \frac{2}{s^3} \right) + 9 \,F\left( s \right) \left( \frac{9}{s^2 + 81} \right) \end{align*}$

Now solve for $F\left( s \right) $.
 


I find this equation to be quite interesting. It looks like a combination of a quadratic function and an integral. I'm curious to know what the function f(t) represents and how it relates to the integral in the equation. Can you provide any more context or information about this equation?
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K