Laplace equation derivation, where does the potential go

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the Laplace equation in the context of potential fields, specifically addressing the role of potential in Lagrange's equations. Participants clarify that in a conservative field, the potential V is solely a function of position, leading to the conclusion that the term \(\frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{j}}\) disappears in the equations of motion. The Lagrangian is defined as \(\mathcal{L} = T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j)\), where the potential does not depend on velocity, thus simplifying the analysis of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with conservative fields
  • Knowledge of generalized coordinates and velocities
  • Basic concepts of potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lagrange's equations in detail
  • Explore the implications of conservative forces on potential energy
  • Learn about the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the applications of the Laplace equation in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators looking to explain the concepts of potential fields and Lagrangian dynamics.

Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Since the potential field is only a function of position, not velocity, Lagrange's equations are as follows:
592afce1200ba232f3ce737cb32f2e25.png


(Wikipedia, image 1)

Homework Equations


6aa558a2b076e81bd4c97d6d5f168838.png


(Wikipedia, image 2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, -\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{q_{j}}}

How is speed involved in this derivative of potential by generalized coordinate (upper left, image 1)? Potential only depends on the position, we are assuming a conservative field, and that is what we are doing, how does this term disappear?
Feels like saying F=-\nabla V=0.
I mean, I can understand eg. generalized impulse depending on speed: p_{j}=\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot q_{j}}}, but not the potential-evaporating transition:
\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot q_{j}}}\right)-\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{q_{j}}}=0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So what is your question exactly? Cant quite follow.
 
My problem is in the sentence:
Since the potential field is only a function of position, not velocity, Lagrange's equations are as follows:
And in:
\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{g_{j}}} disappearing from the very first statement.
So - where does it go, g_{j} is a generalized coordinate, not generalized velocity..?
 
For a conservative field, which is only dependent on position, the lagrangian is defined as: ##\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\dot q_j, q_j, t) = T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j)##.

In particular, this means that:
$${\partial \mathcal{L}\over \partial \dot q_i} = {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}(T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j))
= {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}V(q_j)
= {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - 0$$
 
Thanks! That makes perfect sense, but it means that there is an error in:
592afce1200ba232f3ce737cb32f2e25.png


since here, very literally, \frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{j}}=0
 
Well, what is the following?
$${\partial \mathcal{L}\over \partial q_i} = {\partial \over \partial q_i}(T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j)) $$
Uku said:
since here, very literally, \frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{j}}=0
Uhh :confused:
How do you get that?
 
I think I mixed up, the potentials subtract. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K