Laplace equation derivation, where does the potential go

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the Laplace equation in the context of Lagrangian mechanics, specifically focusing on the role of potential energy as a function of position rather than velocity. Participants are exploring the implications of this distinction within Lagrange's equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand why the derivative of potential with respect to generalized coordinates appears to vanish in the context of conservative fields. Questions are raised about the implications of potential being a function of position and how this relates to Lagrange's equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions made about the potential function and its derivatives. Some have provided clarifications regarding the structure of the Lagrangian, while others express confusion about the implications of these clarifications. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of Lagrangian mechanics and the assumptions inherent in conservative fields. There are indications of potential errors in initial statements regarding the derivatives of potential energy, which are being critically examined.

Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Since the potential field is only a function of position, not velocity, Lagrange's equations are as follows:
592afce1200ba232f3ce737cb32f2e25.png


(Wikipedia, image 1)

Homework Equations


6aa558a2b076e81bd4c97d6d5f168838.png


(Wikipedia, image 2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, -\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{q_{j}}}

How is speed involved in this derivative of potential by generalized coordinate (upper left, image 1)? Potential only depends on the position, we are assuming a conservative field, and that is what we are doing, how does this term disappear?
Feels like saying F=-\nabla V=0.
I mean, I can understand eg. generalized impulse depending on speed: p_{j}=\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot q_{j}}}, but not the potential-evaporating transition:
\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot q_{j}}}\right)-\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{q_{j}}}=0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So what is your question exactly? Cant quite follow.
 
My problem is in the sentence:
Since the potential field is only a function of position, not velocity, Lagrange's equations are as follows:
And in:
\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{g_{j}}} disappearing from the very first statement.
So - where does it go, g_{j} is a generalized coordinate, not generalized velocity..?
 
For a conservative field, which is only dependent on position, the lagrangian is defined as: ##\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\dot q_j, q_j, t) = T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j)##.

In particular, this means that:
$${\partial \mathcal{L}\over \partial \dot q_i} = {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}(T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j))
= {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}V(q_j)
= {\partial \over \partial \dot q_i}T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - 0$$
 
Thanks! That makes perfect sense, but it means that there is an error in:
592afce1200ba232f3ce737cb32f2e25.png


since here, very literally, \frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{j}}=0
 
Well, what is the following?
$${\partial \mathcal{L}\over \partial q_i} = {\partial \over \partial q_i}(T(\dot q_j, q_j, t) - V(q_j)) $$
Uku said:
since here, very literally, \frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{j}}=0
Uhh :confused:
How do you get that?
 
I think I mixed up, the potentials subtract. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K