Laplace equation with irregular boundaries

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving Laplace's Equation on irregular domains, specifically in 2D and 3D geometries. It establishes that analytical methods, such as separation of variables, are only applicable when boundaries are defined by constant coordinates in Cartesian or cylindrical systems. For irregular boundaries, numerical techniques are typically employed, although approximate analytical methods can provide insights. The book "Methods of Theoretical Physics" by P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach is recommended for further understanding of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's Equation and boundary-value problems
  • Familiarity with separation of variables in mathematical physics
  • Knowledge of complex functions and conformal mappings
  • Basic principles of numerical methods for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of separation of variables in solving Laplace's Equation
  • Explore numerical methods for solving partial differential equations in irregular domains
  • Learn about generalized Fourier series and their applications in boundary-value problems
  • Investigate the use of complex analysis in solving 2D Laplace problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with boundary-value problems, particularly those working with irregular geometries in applied mathematics and numerical analysis.

physwiz222
Messages
79
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
We can solve Laplace’a Equation on regular shapes like squares and circles but what if we have an irregular shape can it still be solved
Is there a way to solve Laplace’s Equation on irregular domains if the domain’s shape is given by a function for example a 2D parabolic plate. I keep seeing numerical methods but I want to know is there an ANALYTICAL method to solve it on an irregular domain. If there isn't are there approximate analytical methods to solve it. If it isn't solvable why not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF
vanhees71 said:
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
Interesting but one more question can separation of variables be used for a solution on an irregular boundary given by a function. And how common are irregular geometries encountered in real life problems
 
Last edited:
vanhees71 said:
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
How about the 3D case
 
physwiz222 said:
Interesting but one more question can separation of variables be used for a solution on an irregular boundary given by a function. And how common are irregular geometries encountered in real life problems
For The Laplace equation you can only use separation of variables when the boundaries are on surfaces where one of the coordinates is a constant. In Cartesian coordinates, the boundaries must be x=constant or y=constant or z=constant. In cylindrical coordinates the boundaries must be r=constant, z=constant or theta=constant. Etc.

In real life it is common to have irregular boundaries, and we usually must resort to numerical techniques. However, solving the simple problems in textbooks and examining properties of the solutions often yields a lot of insight to help with understanding those real-life cases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K