I Laplace equation with irregular boundaries

AI Thread Summary
Solving Laplace’s Equation on irregular domains analytically is challenging, as separation of variables typically requires boundaries where one coordinate is constant. In 2D cases, complex functions and conformal mappings offer elegant solutions, but irregular geometries are common in real-life applications, often necessitating numerical methods. The use of generalized Fourier series can help in boundary-value problems, but these methods are limited to specific coordinate systems. While analytical solutions may not be feasible for all irregular shapes, studying simpler textbook problems can provide valuable insights. Ultimately, numerical techniques are frequently employed for practical applications involving irregular boundaries.
physwiz222
Messages
79
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
We can solve Laplace’a Equation on regular shapes like squares and circles but what if we have an irregular shape can it still be solved
Is there a way to solve Laplace’s Equation on irregular domains if the domain’s shape is given by a function for example a 2D parabolic plate. I keep seeing numerical methods but I want to know is there an ANALYTICAL method to solve it on an irregular domain. If there isn't are there approximate analytical methods to solve it. If it isn't solvable why not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
 
vanhees71 said:
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
Interesting but one more question can separation of variables be used for a solution on an irregular boundary given by a function. And how common are irregular geometries encountered in real life problems
 
Last edited:
vanhees71 said:
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
How about the 3D case
 
physwiz222 said:
Interesting but one more question can separation of variables be used for a solution on an irregular boundary given by a function. And how common are irregular geometries encountered in real life problems
For The Laplace equation you can only use separation of variables when the boundaries are on surfaces where one of the coordinates is a constant. In Cartesian coordinates, the boundaries must be x=constant or y=constant or z=constant. In cylindrical coordinates the boundaries must be r=constant, z=constant or theta=constant. Etc.

In real life it is common to have irregular boundaries, and we usually must resort to numerical techniques. However, solving the simple problems in textbooks and examining properties of the solutions often yields a lot of insight to help with understanding those real-life cases.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top