Laplace Transform of e^(-t)cos2t u(t-1)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Laplace transform of the function e^(-t)cos(2t)u(t-1) requires adjusting the limits of integration due to the unit step function u(t-1). The correct limits for the integral are from 1 to infinity, leading to the expression integral of e^(-(s+1)t)cos(2t) dt. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the influence of the step function on both the limits and the function itself, particularly when considering transformations involving trigonometric identities and the quotient rule of derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their definitions
  • Familiarity with unit step functions (u(t))
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Laplace transform with step functions
  • Learn how to apply trigonometric identities in Laplace transforms
  • Explore integration techniques for evaluating Laplace transforms
  • Review the quotient rule of derivatives in the context of Laplace transforms
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, mathematics, and physics who are working with Laplace transforms, particularly those dealing with piecewise functions and step functions in their analyses.

Moneer81
Messages
158
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



What is the laplace transform of e^(-t) cos 2t u(t-1)


Homework Equations



definition of Laplace transform: LT of f(t) = integral of f(t)e^-st dt, where limits of integration are from 0 to infinity


The Attempt at a Solution



since I have u(t-1) then do I just change the limits of integration to go from 1 to infinity instead?


then I guess what is the fastest way to evaluate the resulting integral:
integral of e^-(s+1)t cos 2t dt ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
my hint is that the step function has a big influence on the limits of integration since the step function is zero to the left side of when the step function is one.

and then...maybe I am not sure, you could use a trigonometry identity
 
OK so I was right in changing the lower limit of integration from 0 to 1?

As far as the integral goes, for a similar problem in a book I was reading they ended up with an expression that was somehow obtained from the quotient rule of derivatives...
 
u(t-1)

take t - 1 = 0 -----> t = 1

but I am not sure if changing the limits of integration forces you to change the "t's" in the function.

ex. cos 2(t-1) and e^-((s+1)(t-1))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
980
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K