Laplace transform of proper rational function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Laplace transform of a proper rational function, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding the partial fraction decomposition of the expression ##\frac{2s + 1}{s^2 - 2s + 2}##. Participants clarify that the denominator should be correctly stated as ##s^2 - 2s + 2##, correcting a previous typo. The consensus is that the approach to partial fractions should consider the nature of the denominator, which is a complex quadratic, rather than relying on simpler methods applicable to real roots.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms
  • Knowledge of partial fraction decomposition
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their properties
  • Experience with algebraic manipulation of rational functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of partial fractions for complex quadratic denominators
  • Learn about the properties of Laplace transforms involving complex functions
  • Explore the implications of typos in mathematical problem-solving
  • Review examples of Laplace transforms of proper rational functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, or physics who are working with Laplace transforms and require clarity on partial fraction decomposition techniques.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
##\frac{2s + 1}{((s - 1)(s - 1)} = \frac{A(s - 1) + B(s - 1)}{(s - 1)(s - 1)}##
For this problem (b),
1713580812875.png

The solution is,
1713580841965.png

However, I don't understand how they got their partial fractions here (Going from step 1 to 2).

My attempt to convert into partial fractions is:

##\frac{2s + 1}{(s - 1)(s - 1)} = \frac{A(s - 1) + B(s - 1)}{(s - 1)(s - 1)}##

Thus,

##2s + 1 = A(s - 1) + B(s - 1)##
##2s + 1 = (A + B)s - A - B##

##2 = A + B##
##1 = - A - B##
##-1 = A + B##

However, ##2 ≠ -1##

Does someone please know how they got their partial fractions expression in step 2?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I disagree with their first step. ##\frac {2s+1}{s^2-2s+1} = \frac {2s}{(s-1)^2} + \frac{1}{(s-1)^2}##.
I don't know why they are adding 1 to the denominators.
CORRECTION: The text in the OP is a typo and the actual problem has denominator ##s^2-2s+2##. Thanks, @Orodruin .
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
FactChecker said:
I disagree with their first step. ##\frac {2s+1}{s^2-2s+1} = \frac {2s}{(s-1)^2} + \frac{1}{(s-1)^2}##.
I don't know why they are adding 1 to the denominators.
Because the actual problem has the denominator ##s^2 - 2s + \color{Red}{2}## … the 1 in the solution’s first expression is a typo.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and FactChecker
Apart from that, your partial fraction ansatz is equivalent to assuming
$$
2s + 1 = (A+B)(s-1)
$$
This obviously will not work. You should check how to do partial fractions when the denominator is a square (or higher power). Even if it will not be useful here.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Orodruin said:
is a typo
Typos seem quite overabundant in the solutions of the OP’s threads. If this is the main mode of learning, they may want to consider a different source.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
There are no tricky partial fractions involved in this problem. Every step is a simple rearrangement of the fractions.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
I mean, you can do partial fractions, but the roots of the denominator are complex and the approach in the solution is much more straightforward.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K