Laplace Transform with Double Roots

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Laplace transforms, specifically focusing on the implications of double roots in the context of inverse transforms. The original poster expresses uncertainty regarding the treatment of double roots and their effects on the inverse transform process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to handle double roots in Laplace transforms and questions the impact of these roots on the inverse transform expression. Some participants raise concerns about the definitions of variables A and B in the context of partial fractions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on relevant identities and properties of Laplace transforms. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the setup of the problem, particularly in relation to the partial fraction decomposition.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential ambiguity in the values of A and B, as well as the need to consider the delay property of the Laplace transform due to the presence of the term in the denominator. The original poster also mentions a lack of recent practice with double roots since previous coursework.

nwilkins259
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prepare for an exam and we were warned that the Laplace transforms given to us may have Complex roots, double roots, or double complex roots.

I'm comfortable with complex roots, but I can't find a problem in the textbook that deals with double roots, and I haven't used them since Linear Algebra and Diff. Equations.

So hypothetically, If current I = (s+12)/[(s+3)2]
S1,2 = -3, -3

and after partial fractions A= 9 and B = 1

what is the inverse transform of I? how does the double root affect the expression? I vaguely remember something about multiplying e of the second double by t. Can someone show me the full expression?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope you realize we can only guess what A and B are supposed to stand for.
 
Apologies, I've been staring at these equations for so long I've lost context.

A/(s+3)^2 + B/(s+3) = (s+12)/[(s+3)^2]
 
Remember the identity:

\mathbb{L}\left(t f(t)\right) = -F'(s)

Then let 9/(s+3)^2 = -F'(s).
 
Also, chances are your table includes 1/s and 1/s2. Then use the delay property of the Laplace transform to account for the +3 in the denominator.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K