Large Hadron Collider - Few Questions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the operational principles of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), specifically focusing on the use of magnetic fields for proton acceleration and the choice of protons over electrons for collisions. It includes theoretical and conceptual aspects of particle physics and accelerator design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the LHC uses microwaves to accelerate particles, while the magnets are primarily for confinement rather than acceleration.
  • It is noted that protons are preferred over electrons due to the significant synchrotron radiation that electrons would emit because of their lower mass, which would lead to energy loss.
  • One participant mentions that protons are more suitable for the types of experiments conducted at the LHC.
  • Another point raised is that electron-positron collisions are considered "cleaner" than proton-proton or proton-antiproton collisions due to the nature of their interactions.
  • A participant discusses the planned International Linear Collider (ILC) and its design considerations regarding the energy levels for electron-positron collisions, highlighting the relationship between the LHC and ILC in terms of particle production.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the advantages and disadvantages of using protons versus electrons for collisions, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of particles under acceleration and the implications of their mass on radiation. There are also unresolved questions regarding the optimal energy levels for future accelerators.

Zak.azeemi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain a bit how does the LHC uses magnetic filed to accelerate protons?
And why does it use protons for the collision?
Couldn't they have used electrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The LHC, like many other particle accelerators, accelerates particles using microwaves. Their electric fields kick the particles forward as they pass.

The LHC's magnets, like those of other circular particle accelerators, are for keeping the particles confined in it, not for accelerating them.

The LHC uses protons and not electrons, because electrons would radiate too much synchrotron radiation, a side effect of being continually deflected. That's because electrons are nearly 2000 times less massive than protons, and thus approach much closer to c for the same energy, giving them a 2000-times-higher gamma factor.
 
As the post above says, electrons would radiate away too much of their energy. The smaller the mass, the more energy a particle will radiate away as it is accelerated or decelerated away from its path. Also, protons fit better for the experiments they are running.
 
It must be pointed out that electron-positron collisions are much "cleaner" than proton-proton or proton-antiproton ones. That's because they are not strongly-interacting composite systems, as (anti)protons are.

When an electron and positron meet each other, they will produce a virtual photon, and with enough energy, also a virtual Z. They may also produce a virtual Higgs, but because of the electron's low mass, that particle will have a VERY small amplitude.

In fact, there's an International Linear Collider being planned, and an important question of its design is how much energy it should accelerate its electrons and positrons to. It should be enough to make interesting new particles, but it should not be enough to make the accelerator too difficult to finance.

That's where the LHC will come in. It should be able to make at least some of the particles that the ILC is to produce, and knowing their energies will help the ILC's designers work out what to shoot for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K