Large scale Quantum computing developments

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on recent developments in large-scale quantum computing, particularly focusing on the work being done at the University of Sussex. Participants explore the implications of a new method that purportedly moves beyond traditional laser beam approaches, raising questions about its potential impact on the future of quantum computing technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about the University of Sussex's new method for constructing large-scale quantum computers, suggesting it could represent a significant breakthrough.
  • Others caution that while the new approach may simplify scaling compared to traditional methods, substantial engineering challenges remain, and it may take years to assess its effectiveness.
  • One participant argues that claims of progress are exaggerated, comparing the leap from basic quantum phenomena to practical quantum computing to the evolutionary jump from simple amino acids to humans.
  • There is a discussion about the current capabilities of quantum computers, with some noting that they are limited in function, primarily able to perform simple calculations.
  • Another participant highlights the complexity of factorization in quantum computing, suggesting that while it is theoretically more efficient, practical limitations persist.
  • Some participants reference additional research and articles related to quantum states and materials, indicating a broader context of ongoing exploration in the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the significance of the Sussex research and the current state of quantum computing technology. Some express optimism, while others remain skeptical about the claims made.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges of scaling quantum computing technologies and the limitations of current quantum computers, which are not yet capable of complex tasks like factoring large numbers. There is also mention of unresolved technical details and assumptions regarding the new methods discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those following advancements in quantum computing, researchers in related fields, and individuals curious about the implications of new technologies in quantum mechanics.

1oldman2
Messages
1,456
Reaction score
1,209
I have been reading lately about the University of Sussex work on large scale quantum computing that doesn't require the Laser beam approach to controlling the atom. This seems like a huge breakthrough in the development of quantum computers however a forum search doesn't have any mention of it, are there any thoughts on how this new approach will impact the future of quantum computing ?

http://www.sussex.ac.uk/newsandevents/?id=28441
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/38093
Scientists at the University of Sussex have invented a ground-breaking new method that puts the construction of large-scale quantum computers within reach of current technology.

Universal quantum computers can be built in principle - but the technology challenges are tremendous. The engineering required to build one is considered more difficult than manned space travel to Mars – until now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
I was thinking the same. Seems like a big breakthough but no chat about it on the net.

I have nothing to add sadly as i just recently began following the development of quantum computing.

They said it will take 4 years to build a scaled up version. I hope Microsoft or similar will give them a hand to speed things. They do seem motivated so maybe they will work faster as a small team. Congrats to them and long may their success continue
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
The guys at Sussex are doing some very interesting work. However, it is just one of several competing technologies and although scaling up their technology might be a bit easier than with normal optics it is still extremely challenging. Hence, it will be several years before we know how well this technology scales up to larger circuits.

(this is not my area but I tend to go to the same workshops/conferences as the guys from Sussex, so I've seen several talks over the past couple of years where they've discussed their experiments)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
1oldman2 said:
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/newsandevents/?id=28441
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/38093
Scientists at the University of Sussex have invented a ground-breaking new method that puts the construction of large-scale quantum computers within reach of current technology.
That's a huge exaggeration. From Schroedinger's cat to a programmable quantum computer is a step like from the first amino acid to a human being. At present, quantum computers can hardly do more that multiplying 3*5. See the discussion at https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/status-of-quantum-computing.880521
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and davidbenari
A. Neumaier said:
quantum computers can hardly do more that multiplying 3*5
It's not about multiplying 3 and 5, it's about factorizing 15. :biggrin:
With classical computation the latter task seems much harder than the former (especially when 15 is replaced by a much larger number), but nobody knows how to prove that it really is much harder.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Demystifier said:
It's not about multiplying 3 and 5, it's about factorizing 15. :biggrin:
With classical computation the latter task seems much harder than the former (especially when 15 is replaced by a much larger number), but nobody knows how to prove that it really is much harder.
It doesn't matter as long as quantum computers cannot factor numbers with hundred digits. It will take a century...
 
gavztheouch said:
I was thinking the same. Seems like a big breakthough but no chat about it on the net.
Not much at all being mentioned, maybe more soon though. I did come across this.
http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.220501
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.2202.pdf
This seemed intriguing although it's way past my level. I'm particularly wondering if the QSL mentioned will be involved in any of the ColdAtom experiments JPL is planning on the ISS.
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nphys3971.html

http://www.technology.org/2016/12/0...tal-point-extremely-rare-quantum-spin-liquid/

"Imagine a state of matter where this entanglement doesn’t involve two electrons but involves, three, five, 10 or 10 billion particles all in the same system," Mourigal said. "You can create a very, very exotic state of matter based on the fact that all these particles are entangled with each other. There are no individual particles anymore, but one huge electron ensemble acting collectively."

The ytterbium crystal was first synthesized a year ago by scientists in China, where the government in Beijing has invested heavily in hopes of creating synthetic quantum materials with novel properties. It appears they may have now succeeded, said Mourigal, an assistant professor at Georgia Tech’s School of Physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A. Neumaier said:
From Schroedinger's cat to a programmable quantum computer
I know, :sorry: I nearly didn't post that link in particular, and cringed when I did. I figured the "cat" reference was a little bit mainstream pop but went with it because it was a U of S site.
Thanks for the thread link, that was interesting.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K