Larger structure than observable universe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of structures larger than the observable universe, emphasizing that while the universe may be infinitely large, current scientific understanding does not provide evidence for such structures. Participants argue that unlike atomic phenomena, which can be described despite being unobservable, the large-scale universe lacks direct observational evidence for anything beyond galaxies. The conversation highlights the role of dark matter and dark energy, noting that while these are not directly observable, they can be inferred through gravitational effects. The consensus suggests that exploring the existence of larger structures is speculative without concrete evidence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmology and the observable universe
  • Familiarity with dark matter and dark energy concepts
  • Knowledge of general relativity and its implications
  • Basic grasp of atomic and subatomic physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the LCDM model and its implications for the universe's structure
  • Explore inhomogeneity effects in cosmology and their relevance to the observable universe
  • Study the properties and detection methods of dark matter
  • Investigate theories regarding the infinite nature of the universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in the fundamental structure and limits of the universe.

dpa
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
just like the atomic world is unobservable to our normal optical observation,
can it not be that there can be out there some structure too large that we are deluded to believe that there are merely galaxies and all empty beyond.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dpa,

All one can really do is look at the arguments. The reason why we can't observe small things using light is simply because they are smaller than the wavelength of light we can use to measure it (and if we try too make wavelengths smaller we disturb the thing more). It does not seem like this is any objection in the case of very large objects.

Also I don't think anyone really sticks to a hypothesis that there is nothing beyond the observable universe. Actually I think most cosmologists would expect the universe to be infinitely large and so we cannot possibly observe it all. In any case the difference between this case and the atomic scale case is that scientists have been able to observe, measure and describe things on an atomic and even subatomic scale. Then we can say something like we know something of a certain (observed) nature exists on these scales, but we cannot observe it in the usual optic sense. Moreover we have an explanation of why this is impossible.

On the large scales I think the only thing sort of related are things like dark matter (and possible dark energy, but I know nothing about this). Dark matter is also not observable by light of any kind, hence dark. We can observe it only through gravity, however we can through these same means also make some estimate of it's size and I don't think it will be larger than say a galaxy. So the fact that we cannot see it does not seem to be merely because of its size.

So to answer the question: of course it could, anything is possible. There is however nothing to be explained by this reasoning so it doesn't pay to think about it. First find something 'invisible' and large, then try to explain why it is invisble!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
764
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K