Largest conceivable particle accelerator ?

In summary: So you tell me, how do you store THAT much energy in a small enough volume, before it becomes a black hole?So what you are asking is whether we can create a black hole with our particle collider?In summary, the size of a particle accelerator is not limited by physics itself, but by technological limitations. The larger the energy of a particle collider, the smaller it can probe, but at some point, the energy itself will become a black hole. This presents a limitation on how much energy can be stored in a small enough volume before it becomes a black hole. Therefore, there may be a limit to how far down we can probe using particle accelerators, and the theoretical limit
  • #1
oldtobor
132
0
What would be the largest possible particle accelerator if all the matter-energy of the universe was used to build it ? How far down in sizes could we probe ? I think as of now we can probe 10^-10 mm (?) but to probe even 10 times smaller you would need an accelerator 10 times bigger so it would already be 100 km. Now if we had a trillion km long accelerator in theory how far down could we see , 10^-100 mm ? what are the physical limits ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In the year 3 million we may have a particle accelerator of 10^9 km. So then we may see 10^-10*10^-10=10^-20 mm. Planck scale is 10^-40 mm. So we still won't see space-time fluctuations. At 10^-100000 mm there will always be a mystery, the observable universe is actually limited in HOW SMALL WE CAN SEE!
 
  • #3
oldtobor said:
What would be the largest possible particle accelerator if all the matter-energy of the universe was used to build it ? How far down in sizes could we probe ? I think as of now we can probe 10^-10 mm (?) but to probe even 10 times smaller you would need an accelerator 10 times bigger so it would already be 100 km. Now if we had a trillion km long accelerator in theory how far down could we see , 10^-100 mm ? what are the physical limits ?

There is something odd about this question. There is no physical reason why particle accelerator has to be "BIG". The reason that we do now is because the conventional accelerating mechanism depends on using copper cavities as the accelerating structure. We can only put so much gradient within such a structure before copper breaks down (~30 MV/m). That is why if we use such a thing, we have to keep making it larger and larger to achieve higher energies.

There are several centers around the world that are working on research on new accelerating structures that may go beyond the copper limit. The UCLA/USC group is heavily working on plasma wakefield. Another center in Germany just released a paper on using laser acceleration. I am part of a group that works on wakefield in a dielectric structure as the accelerating structure. If we manage to not encounter any potential breakdown problem in our dielectric, we believe we might get to 100 MV/m gradient. Any one of these new accelerating mechanism could easily make an accelerator "shorter" than current technology requires.

So within the physics itself, there's no limit or requirement on "size" of an accelerator.

Zz.
 
  • #4
ZapperZ said:
So within the physics itself, there's no limit or requirement on "size" of an accelerator.
Zz.

That's good to know. Although too bad I won't be seeing any solar system scaled particle accelerators to probe Planck lengths then :P
 
  • #5
Thanks for the ideas. But are there theoretical limits to how "powerful" an accelerator can be ? Imagine using all the energy in the universe to accelerate particles, what would be the limits size wise ? Could we in theory reach the Planck level and see what is going on at that level with such a science fiction technology or are there real physical limits to how far we can see ? I don't think we can get passed 10^-100 mm.
 
  • #6
oldtobor said:
Thanks for the ideas. But are there theoretical limits to how "powerful" an accelerator can be ? Imagine using all the energy in the universe to accelerate particles, what would be the limits size wise ? Could we in theory reach the Planck level and see what is going on at that level with such a science fiction technology or are there real physical limits to how far we can see ? I don't think we can get passed 10^-100 mm.

You missed making a major connection between "powerful accelerator" and "how small we can see".

Particle colliders [I'm guessing you want to use particle accelerators for particle collision in high energy physics] do not really LOOK at the physical size of anything. Unlike an electron microscope, for example, where the deBroglie wavelength could be the physical limit of the imaging resolution, particle colliders do not image nor probe "sizes". In fact, the larger the collision energy, the "heavier" the particle it can generate (look at the theoretical mass for the Higgs, for example).

So this discussion about accelerators and how small we can see using it is a bit puzzling.

Zz.
 
  • #7
ZapperZ said:
You missed making a major connection between "powerful accelerator" and "how small we can see".

Honestly particle physics is not an area that I have studied. However, I have read time and again that the larger the energy of a particle collider, the smaller it can probe. I'm not sure how this works, since I have no idea how you can create all the exotic particles we do create with them in the first place. But looking at the De Broglie equation: [tex] \lambda = \frac{h}{p}[/tex], where p is the momentum would suggest that the larger the velocity, momentum or energy we give to a particle, the smaller its wavelength. In an analogy with the microscope you mentioned, the smaller the wavelength of our probing carrier, the better resolution we can get. That's how I would've seen it.
 
  • #8
mezarashi said:
Honestly particle physics is not an area that I have studied. However, I have read time and again that the larger the energy of a particle collider, the smaller it can probe. I'm not sure how this works, since I have no idea how you can create all the exotic particles we do create with them in the first place. But looking at the De Broglie equation: [tex] \lambda = \frac{h}{p}[/tex], where p is the momentum would suggest that the larger the velocity, momentum or energy we give to a particle, the smaller its wavelength. In an analogy with the microscope you mentioned, the smaller the wavelength of our probing carrier, the better resolution we can get. That's how I would've seen it.

But this is what I have said. At SOME point, the particle with THAT much energy will no longer just "probe" the object it is hitting, but rather will CAUSE a particle collision that will disintergrate the object being probed. There's a reason why electron microscopes have energy in the keV range. Get it to GeV, and you're no longer "probing" but causing a substantial electron-ion collision that goes into the high-energy physics particle collider regime.

Zz.
 

What is the largest conceivable particle accelerator?

The largest conceivable particle accelerator is currently the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, with a circumference of 27 kilometers. However, there are plans for even larger colliders, such as the Future Circular Collider (FCC) which could have a circumference of up to 100 kilometers.

What is the purpose of a particle accelerator?

Particle accelerators are used to accelerate particles to high speeds and energies, allowing scientists to study their properties and interactions. This can provide insights into the fundamental building blocks of matter and the nature of the universe.

How does a particle accelerator work?

A particle accelerator uses electric fields to accelerate particles and magnetic fields to steer them towards a target. The particles are then collided with each other or with a stationary target, and the resulting interactions can be studied by detectors.

What types of particles are accelerated in a particle accelerator?

Particle accelerators can accelerate a wide range of particles, including protons, electrons, positrons, and heavy ions. Each type of particle has its own unique properties and can provide different insights into the nature of matter.

What are the potential benefits of building a larger particle accelerator?

A larger particle accelerator could allow scientists to explore higher energies and reach new frontiers in particle physics, potentially leading to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in our understanding of the universe. It could also have practical applications in fields such as medicine and technology.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
638
Replies
4
Views
890
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
914
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
329
Back
Top