Latest Theoretical predictions to help guide my career choices

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exploration of significant theoretical predictions in high energy physics made in the last 50 years that have been experimentally verified. Participants express their concerns about the current state of theoretical physics and the potential for future discoveries, particularly in light of recent experimental advancements and limitations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks information on new theoretical predictions in high energy physics that have been experimentally confirmed, explicitly excluding unverified theories like supersymmetry and string theory.
  • Another participant mentions that the only recent verified predictions are related to gravity theories challenged by neutron star collision observations and highlights the Higgs boson discovery.
  • A participant expresses concern about the feasibility of making new discoveries in theoretical physics, questioning the potential for breakthroughs given the limitations of upcoming experimental upgrades.
  • One participant encourages not to let fear dictate career choices, referencing historical breakthroughs in physics as examples of unexpected progress.
  • Another participant counters that aspiring to make a rare, groundbreaking discovery may lead to disappointment and suggests focusing on smaller, incremental contributions to science instead.
  • A participant reflects on the value of teaching and sharing knowledge as a fulfilling aspect of a career in physics, acknowledging their own romantic notions of making a significant discovery.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the potential for new discoveries in theoretical physics. While some encourage perseverance despite fears, others emphasize the reality of incremental progress over monumental breakthroughs.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the future of theoretical physics and the challenges of making significant advancements, particularly in light of experimental limitations and the nature of scientific discovery.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I would like to follow a career in theoretical physics (mainly high energy). Can someone point me towards the most important theoretical predictions made in the last 50 years (basically after the QCD period, W, Z and Higgs predictions) that have been experimentally tested. By this I mean actual new theories, not corrections to old ones or new methods of computations (like Lattice QCD) and also not things like supersymmetry, string theory or Hawking radiations which (as far as I know) have not been experimentally confirmed yet. I just want to know how much did science progressed theoretically lately and I am not really aware of all new theories that came up (I should work more on that...) so I would really appreciate if someone can point me towards them so I can further investigate. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you summed up most the ones a layman would know. I can't think of any other "new theory" predictions that have been experimentally verified other than the gravity theories destroyed by the recent neutron star collision gravitational wave detection.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/10/colliding-neutron-stars-decapitate-zombie-theory-of-gravity/

or the recent higgs boson and quantum computing news item:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/10/quantum-algorithm-finds-higgs-needle-in-photon-haystack/
 
jedishrfu said:
I think you summed up most the ones a layman would know. I can't think of any other "new theory" predictions that have been experimentally verified other than the gravity theories destroyed by the recent neutron star collision gravitational wave detection.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/10/colliding-neutron-stars-decapitate-zombie-theory-of-gravity/

or the recent higgs boson and quantum computing news item:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/10/quantum-algorithm-finds-higgs-needle-in-photon-haystack/
Yeah, this is what I am kinda afraid of. I want to go into theoretical physics, but based on the evolution in the recent years, I am not sure what to expect. Like, realistically, what chances does someone have to come up with something new? I understand this is how things work in theory, you make mathematical models and most of them are wrong and this is fine. But based on the latest news from experimental fields (for example CERN will have an upgrade in 2024, which will increase luminosity and maybe the energy, but not by an astonishing value), predictions at high energy (and I am not talking about plank scale, even much lower than that) will be impossible to be tested. So if nothing new lies up to those energies, it means that no real breakthrough will be made in the next 50 (?) years. Am I missing something?
 
Your fear is true but if no one tries then progress will be slower. Think of the history before Einstein's miracle year. Folks believed that all of physics had been discovered but the remaining few questions spawned QM, SR and GR. So i'd say don't let your fear direct your life. But what do I know I'm a robot.
 
Last edited:
jedishrfu said:
So i'd say don't let your fear direct your life

I am going to disagree and say, yes, let fear direct your life.

If you want to go into physics because you want to make a once- (maybe twice) per-century discovery, you shouldn't. The vast majority of people in it do not make a once-per-century discovery because they come along about, well, once per century. You will be unhappy. You should go into it only if you will be satisfied by chipping away at some little problem that nobody ever heard of - because that's what scientists do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: robphy
Vanadium 50 said:
You should go into it only if you will be satisfied by chipping away at some little problem that nobody ever heard of - because that's what scientists do.

I like this sentence, almost as if the words were directed at me. I am somewhat guilty of this - a romantic notion still somewhere in the back of my head, that I might be the one to stumble upon "a motherlode".

To avoid disappointment, I keep telling myself that there is also the teaching aspect of it - imparting your vast knowledge upon future generations, which can be quite gratifying. Also, reading about the discoveries of others. As Einstein once said, today might also be "marvelous time to be alive".

(Sorry, gone a bit on a tangent there.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K