Laying on the beach while sunseting question

  • Thread starter Thread starter djkinney
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the radius of a planet based on the time it takes for the sun to disappear from view while lying on a beach and then standing up. The context is set near the equator of a fictional planet, with the elapsed time given as 10.9 seconds and the height of the observer as 1.58 meters. The problem references the duration of a solar day being the same as on Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods for calculating the angle of the sun's descent based on the elapsed time and the total duration of a solar day. There are attempts to derive the angle using different approaches, including ratios and conversions to degrees. Questions arise regarding the correctness of these methods and the relationship between the angle, height, and radius of the planet.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring various methods to derive the angle and subsequently the radius. Some have provided insights into potential errors in calculations and suggested alternative approaches. There is no explicit consensus on the correct method yet, but several productive lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the conversion of time to angle and the implications of using approximate values in calculations. Participants are also considering the impact of roundoff errors in their computations.

djkinney
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that, while lying on a beach near the equator of a far-off planet watching the sun set over a calm ocean, you start a stopwatch just as the top of the sun disappears. You then stand, elevating your eyes by a height H = 1.58 m, and stop the watch when the top of the sun again disappears. If the elapsed time is t = 10.9 s, what is the radius r of the planet to two significant figures? Notice that duration of a solar day at the far-off planet is the same that is on Earth.


Homework Equations


86400 s=1 day

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to solve this by setting the angle, but I think I got the wrong angle. (.0454°)
cos(0.0454°)=((r)/(r+h)) h=1.58
When I solved for the radius I got 1.5e^3, but it is not the right answer. Please help me figure where I went wrong! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi djkinney,

how did you get the angle?

ehild
 
ehild said:
Hi djkinney,

how did you get the angle?

ehild

Hey,
Well I'm not quite sure as to how to get the angle. I tried two different ways so far: First, I tried: 10.9s/86400s=1.26e-4°. The second was me trying something crazy and doesn't make any sense: 10.9s*(1min/60s)*(1hr/60min)*(360/24hr)=.0454°
 
djkinney said:
Hey,
Well I'm not quite sure as to how to get the angle. I tried two different ways so far: First, I tried: 10.9s/86400s=1.26e-4°. The second was me trying something crazy and doesn't make any sense: 10.9s*(1min/60s)*(1hr/60min)*(360/24hr)=.0454°

The first method will be all right, but it is not degrees. 1.26e-4 is the ratio to the total revolution, which corresponds to 360 degrees.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The first method will be all right, but it is not degrees. 1.26e-4 is the ratio to the total revolution, which corresponds to 360 degrees.

ehild

Okay, so that means that 1.26E^-4*360°=.04536° for the angle? Then I would still be getting my final answer as 1.5E^3
 
Well, what is that angle and how is it related to the radius of the planet and your height?

ehild
 
Cos(Angle) = R/(R+1.58)

Angle = 360 * 10.9/(24 * 60 * 60)
 

Attachments

  • Planet.JPG
    Planet.JPG
    6.5 KB · Views: 812
Last edited:
Okay, so when I solve for the angle I get .0454°
Then take the cos of the angle in which I get ≈ .9897
Then I set that equal to R/(R+h) h=1.58 → .9897=R/(R+1.58)
Solve for R by multiplying .9897(R+1.58)=R
Then get like terms of one side 1.59=R-R(.9897)
A R can be taken out 1.59=R(1-.9897)
Then I divide 1.59/(1-.9897)=R
R=154m
Is this the correct setup?
 
I get

R = 1.58 Cos(Angle) / (1-cos(angle))

I make Cos(angle) = 0.9999996858

and

R= 5,029,238 meters

The answer is error prone because the denominator involves subtracting two similar numbers. Might be best to give an answer such as approx 5,000,000 meters?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
CWatters said:
I get

R = 1.58 Cos(Angle) / (1-cos(angle))

I make Cos(angle) = 0.9999996858

and

R= 5,029,238 meters

The answer is error prone because the denominator involves subtracting two similar numbers.

Wow, I would've never done that. Even my calculus professor didn't tell me that. Thank you so much guys for your help!
 
  • #11
Tip: It's usually a mistake to substitute actual values given in the problem until you have rearranged the equations.

The steps I did were..

Cos(angle) = R/(R+1.58)

Cos(angle) * (R+1.58) = R

R*Cos(angle) + 1.58*Cos(angle) = R

1.58*Cos(angle) = R - R*Cos(angle)

1.58*Cos(angle) = R (1 - Cos(angle))

R = 1.58*Cos(angle) / (1 - Cos(angle))

but there might be a shorter way!

I then put the result of Cos(360*10.9/24*60*60) in the memory of the calculator to preserve as many digits as possible while calculating the actual result.
 
  • #12
The problems with roundoff error can be removed by using a Taylor series expansion:

1-cosθ ~ θ2/2
 
Last edited:
  • #13
CWatters said:
Tip: It's usually a mistake to substitute actual values given in the problem until you have rearranged the equations.

The steps I did were..

Cos(angle) = R/(R+1.58)

Cos(angle) * (R+1.58) = R

R*Cos(angle) + 1.58*Cos(angle) = R

1.58*Cos(angle) = R - R*Cos(angle)

1.58*Cos(angle) = R (1 - Cos(angle))

R = 1.58*Cos(angle) / (1 - Cos(angle))

but there might be a shorter way!

I then put the result of Cos(360*10.9/24*60*60) in the memory of the calculator to preserve as many digits as possible while calculating the actual result.

I have no preference about length of finding a solution as long as it's the correct one. Thank you so much once again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
25K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K