LC Filter Voltage Drop Considerations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the design of an H-Bridge inverter and the associated LC filter, specifically addressing voltage drop considerations. Key calculations for reactance using both the fundamental and switching frequencies are questioned, with confusion regarding the correct values for capacitive and inductive reactance. Participants suggest that the reactances should ideally be equal in magnitude but opposite in sign at the fundamental frequency, and that the values should significantly exceed the load resistance. Concerns are raised about the suitability of the chosen inductor size for the high current output. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for proper component selection to ensure effective voltage output from the filter.
GG11
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've gotten a little confused and would like some guidance and confirmation,

I've designed an H-Bridge inverter which should output 100A at 20Vrms onto a 200mΩ load. The current target output peak voltage (with max duty cycle of 98% considered) is 28.86V. The LC filter is made up of a 1500μF Cap and a 60μH L with a Fc of 531Hz, the fundamental is 50Hz, switching is 16KHz.

I'm trying to calculate what compensations (if any) will I need to make to the output peak voltage from the H-Bridge for losses in the filter to ensure 20Vrms is outputted from the filter.

I've found the following calculation but I'm a little confused from its results,

Xc=1/2*pi()*f*C= 1/2*pi()*50*1.5E-3 = 2.4485Ω
Xl=2*pi()*f*L = 2*pi()*50*60E-6 = 53.0516Ω
Z=sqrt(R^2+(Xl-Xc)^2) = sqrt(0.2^2+(53-2.4)^2) = 50.6Ω
I=20Vrms/50.6 = 0.395A
Vlc=I*(Xl-Xc) = 0.395*(53-2.4) = 19.99V

1) Should the frequency in the reactance calcs be the fundamental or the switching?
2) Is I in this case the current through the LC network?
3) Would this result indicate that no or little alteration would be needed to the peak voltage for switching as the voltage across the network is the output voltage?

Many Thanks in advance,

Dale
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Xc = 1/(2*pi()*f*C) - Don't forget the parentheses. I get 2.122.
Xl = 2*pi()*f*L - I get 0.01885, how did you get 53.0516?
It looks like you plan to put both components in series with the load. That's fine but ideally you would want both reactances to be equal in magnitude but opposite in sign (conjugates) at 50 Hz and each value should be at least 10 times the value of the load. I think you will need a much, much bigger inductor and at 100 amps that may be a problem.
 
Xc = 1/(2*pi()*f*C) - Don't forget the parenthesis. The value I get is 2.122066.
Xl = 2*pi()*f*L - The value I get is 0.018850. Are you sure you meant 60 microHenries?

It looks like you intend to put the capacitor and inductor in series with the load. I suggest you pick values that are equal in value but opposite in sign (conjugates) at 50 Hz with each component having a reactance at least 10 times the value of the load.
 
Thread 'I thought it was only Amazon that sold unsafe junk'
I grabbed an under cabinet LED light today at a big box store. Nothing special. 18 inches in length and made to plug several lights together. Here is a pic of the power cord: The drawing on the box led me to believe that it would accept a standard IEC cord which surprised me. But it's a variation of it. I didn't try it, but I would assume you could plug a standard IEC cord into this and have a double male cord AKA suicide cord. And to boot, it's likely going to reverse the hot and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K