LCDM Cosmological Model in Simplified Math (Part 3) - Comments

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the LCDM Cosmological Model as presented in a simplified mathematical format in Part 3 of a series. Participants explore the implications of the model, its accessibility for newcomers to cosmology, and the potential for further elaboration or continuation of the series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses appreciation for the clarity of the two main horizons in the model, noting their calculability and connection as parts of the same integral.
  • There is a suggestion that the work makes cosmology more approachable for newcomers, potentially reducing confusion and frustration.
  • Questions are raised about the possibility of consolidating the three parts of the series and whether a fourth part might be added.
  • Another participant expresses interest in contributing to a continuation of the series, although they are uncertain about the content of a potential part 4.
  • One participant mentions the idea of discussing the three types of recession rates from the LightCone calculator as a possible follow-on topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of the work presented in Part 3 and express interest in further exploration of the topic. However, there is no consensus on the specific content or direction of a potential part 4.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the potential topics for continuation and the completeness of the existing parts, as participants express varying degrees of certainty about what further content might entail.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring cosmology, particularly those seeking simplified mathematical approaches to complex concepts.

Jorrie
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
143
Jorrie submitted a new PF Insights post

The LCDM Cosmological Model in Simplified Math (Part 3)

LCDM3-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcus and Greg Bernhardt
Space news on Phys.org
Jorrie, it's a fine piece of work! I have to say it was a real delight to see Part 3 when I got up this morning.

It's nice to see the two main horizons (the cosmic event horizon and the particle horizon) made easily calculable by the reader---and that they make sense as two parts of the same integral. One as the integral from zero to one, and the other as the same integral taken from one to infinity.

Potentially, I think, by giving a newcomer to cosmology a hands-on grasp of how basic features of the universe can be calculated (by anybody!) you make the subject less ad hoc, and above all less frustrating and confusing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
BTW do you plan to ask Greg or someone else on the staff to consolidate the three parts?
And are you at all tempted to continue and add a part 4 : ^)
Not sure what that would entail---these three pieces seem to form a fairly complete whole---but you might have ideas for a part 4 (although at the moment I can't think what it might be.)

Maybe there's something I could write myself that could continue, complement, expand somehow on this base. If you have any ideas for that let me know (if you prefer via PM.)
 
marcus said:
BTW do you plan to ask Greg or someone else on the staff to consolidate the three parts?
There is a drop down at the top of each article linking the parts together
 
marcus said:
Maybe there's something I could write myself that could continue, complement, expand somehow on this base.
That would be awesome!
 
marcus said:
Not sure what that would entail---these three pieces seem to form a fairly complete whole---but you might have ideas for a part 4 (although at the moment I can't think what it might be.
As I said near the end of part 3, I am thinking that the 3 types of recession rates that we have in the LightCone calculator might be a logical follow-on. Plus perhaps a post-script of some sorts, as you have suggested before (and which you indicated that you are willing to write).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K