Learn About the Thermo-Optic Effect

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DePurpereWolf
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the thermo-optic effect, specifically its mechanisms and implications in materials like amorphous silicon (a-Si) and poly(vinylidene) fluoride (PVDF). Participants explore the relationship between thermal modulation of the refractive index and various physical changes in materials, including lattice parameters and electron density, while considering applications in optical devices such as tunable filters and Fabry-Perot structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the thermo-optic effect as the thermal modulation of the refractive index, influenced by the thermo-optic coefficient α.
  • Others propose that thermal expansion and changes in lattice parameters are responsible for changes in the dielectric constant, which in turn affects the refractive index.
  • A participant questions the simplicity of attributing refractive index changes solely to lattice parameter changes, suggesting that layer thickness and optical path changes are also significant.
  • There are discussions about the role of electron density and the potential quantum effects that may influence the refractive index beyond mechanical changes.
  • Some participants mention that the thermo-optic coefficient is typically small, indicating that changes in carrier density may have a more substantial effect on the refractive index than temperature changes.
  • A reference is provided that discusses the thermo-optic coefficient of a-Si:H films and observed index modulation at elevated temperatures.
  • Another participant introduces the effects of heat treatment on PVDF films and their thermo-optical properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms behind the thermo-optic effect, with no clear consensus on whether lattice parameter changes, electron density variations, or other factors are primarily responsible. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the thermo-optic coefficient for many materials is small, and the relationship between thermal effects and optical properties may depend on various conditions, including the specific material and its structural characteristics. Some assumptions about the mechanisms remain unverified, and the discussion highlights the complexity of the interactions involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers and students in materials science, optics, and semiconductor physics, particularly those exploring the properties of thin films and their applications in optical devices.

DePurpereWolf
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I would like to know more about the thermo-optic effect. I've got the following down:
The thermo-optic effect is the thermal modulation of the refractive index of a material. The refractive index of a material can be modulated as a function of its thermo-optic coefficient α.
[tex]n(\DELTA T)=n_0 + \alpha \cdot \DELTA T .[/tex]
A tunable fabry perot structure can operate by change in its refractive index as function of applied heat.

But my question is what makes this thermo-optic effect. Let's say it is a thin film of amorphous Silicon, how does this change the refractive index when it is heated? I do not think it is just linear to the change in size. Does anything change internally? I would appreciate it if anybody would have more info on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It need not be stricly linear, but I think the thermal expansion is responsible. The primary reason for a change in dielectric constant would be the change in lattice parameter. Another reason would be a change in the crystal structure (at a phase transition), where a sharper change in dielectric properties is observed.

In any case, do not take my word on this. I'm sort of extrapolating from the dielectric properties of gases!
 
Last edited:
Off course I cannot disagree on this that it is the lattice constant change that creates this refractive index change, I just think it's hard to believe.

If it's just a thin layer of a-Si:H on a wafer that is getting thicker, this thin layer is jused in DBR and fabry-perot etalons in which the thickness of the layer is very important. Why don't they just call it optical path change, or correlate it to the lattice parameter change.

Both refractive index and layer thickness are important parameters in the equations for reflectivity in Distributed Bragg Reflectors (DBRs) and filter wavelengths in fabry-perot etalons. When these scientists speak of tunable thin film filters, they use the term tunable refractive index by thermo-optic effect of the medium (a-Si:H in this case) and are silent about the layer height change.

Having a tunable optical filter utilizing the thermo-optic effect means there are multiple thin layers of alternating amorpheus silicon (Hydrogen 'doped') and silicon nitride. Having these alternating thin layers prevents the free lattice paramter increase of the a-Si:H as otherwise it might delaminate. Because of the thin alternating structure the heat will first only result in stress change in the medium.

I just don't believe it is as easy as the lattice paramter change


P.S in an amorpheus silicon you can't really say lattice parameter, but just interpred it as the average bond distance between the Si atoms.

Here is a reference you can check: http://www.aegis-semi.com/technology/publications/Aegis_OFC_Mar2003_main.pdf
 
Oh wait, I'm not saying that the effect is a change in the path length. No, that's not what I meant.

What I should have said is that the change in lattice parameter changes the electron density and the shape of the lattice potential. In turn, this will affect the dielectric constant.

This is not saying that this is the only thing respoonsible for the effect. In a semiconductor, the conduction electron density is a stronger function of temperature than just size effects. The electron density is important because it determines the size of screening, which in turn determines the value of the (Thomas-Fermi, for instance) dielectric function.

Also, look at the typical sizes of the two effects (thermo-optic coefficient, and thermal expansion coefficient). They are both of the order of 10-6 to 10-5 per K. Of course, that's not proof of anything - just supporting evidence, perhaps.

Why don't you just spend an hour in the library (or the internet, if you have journal access) and simply hunt down the theory? I'm interested enough, that if you don't do it by the weekend and settle this question, I might just take a look.
 
Last edited:
I just understood that if the lattice parameter changes, the whole volume per atom has to change, and thus the layer expands. If it is related to the coefficient of expansion it is related to the stress induced by that. If that is the case than heating is indeed the best way to apply the stress, but you could possible get the same thing by (mechanical)pressure. If it is not the expansion of the material, but more like electrons going in the valence band or change in the energy-gap or what not, than it is more of a quantum phenomena, not a 'mechanical' one.
Why don't you just spend an hour in the library (or the internet, if you have journal access) and simply hunt down the theory? I'm interested enough, that if you don't do it by the weekend and settle this question, I might just take a look.
I will, I'm just not near a library now (friday again), i do not have journal access. There are some interesting IOP and IEEE journals that might be about the issue, and I've read some (that I could access), but it just doen't clarify the mechanism that changes the refractive index.
 
For what it's worth, I'm almost positive that strain affects the thermo-optic coefficient. In any case, I'll look more into this tomorrow night or saturday.
 
DePurpereWolf said:
I just understood that if the lattice parameter changes, the whole volume per atom has to change, and thus the layer expands. If it is related to the coefficient of expansion it is related to the stress induced by that. If that is the case than heating is indeed the best way to apply the stress, but you could possible get the same thing by (mechanical)pressure. If it is not the expansion of the material, but more like electrons going in the valence band or change in the energy-gap or what not, than it is more of a quantum phenomena, not a 'mechanical' one.

I don't quite understand the difficulty here. ANY change in the lattice will cause a change in the phonon spectrum. This is what couples to any photon going through the material, and thus, would affect optical property (dispersion, refractive index, transmission, reflectivity etc...). Such a change can be accomplished via stress/strain/mechanical pressure/heat/structural phase transition/etc.

Now, for a semiconductor/dielectric, depending on the energy gap, you can see a difference in, for example, the reflectivity, of the material if you heat it up can cause a significant enough of a change in the charge carrier density. However, if the heating effect is small enough that it doesn't change the phonon spectrum, I'm not so sure as to the extent that such additional charge carriers can affect the refractive index.

Zz.
 
The thermooptic constant for many materials is less than 0.0001%, so the index of refraction chnages very little over normal operating temperatures, the carrier density has a much larger affect on index than temperture change...
 
From the reference given in post #3 the following:
...we have achieved a-Si:H films with thermo-optic coefficient of dn/dT = 3.6x10-4 1/K at 1500nm...
...by applying internal film temperatures of > 400C, silicon index modulation dn/n = 0.04 have been observed...
300C times 0.36x10^-3 is about 0.1, 0.1 over 3.6 is 0.03, 3% change.
There is no talk of applying a current through the a-Si:H and seeing a change in refractive index.
I also am not certain if a-Si:H is conductive or not.
 
  • #10
hi,
The Poly(vinylidene) fluoride (PVDF) thin films with a high content of β-phase were prepared by controlling heat-treatment temperature using casting from the poled solvents. The crystallite microstructure of thin films was depicted by the techniques of X-ray diffraction and FTIR. The results showed that heat treatment was favorable for inducing the β- and γ-phase formation of PVDF. The β phase films were obtained with heat treatment at temperatures ranging from 60°C to 120°C and annealing at 120°C after casting from DMF. The thermo-optical effect of β phase PVDF films was investigated using a spectroscopic ellipsometer. At temperatures ranging from 20°C to 100°C, the refractive index of PVDF was negatively correlated with the temperature between 350 and 1500 nm. The value of the t.o. coefficient of PVDF films was calculated at all temperatures. The maximum value of the t.o. coefficient was about 3.3 × 10-4/°C at the ascending stage of temperature and 3.0 × 10-4/°C at the descending stage of temperature. Therefore, it is possible to use the thermo-optic effect of the β phase PVDF for long wavelength infrared imaging.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
533
Replies
2
Views
473
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
912
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K