Learning integrals and derivitaves in pre calculus.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and appropriateness of learning integrals and derivatives while still in pre-calculus, particularly in relation to solving scientific equations in contexts like science olympiad. Participants explore the prerequisites for calculus and the educational system's structure regarding math progression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about being two years away from calculus and questions whether learning integrals and derivatives now would be too difficult.
  • Another participant suggests that precalculus is not strictly necessary for studying calculus and recommends a specific book that introduces calculus concepts alongside precalculus material.
  • A different viewpoint argues that a bright student could learn calculus with a solid understanding of algebra and trigonometry, although they note that advanced topics like magnetic flux may require more than a basic calculus course.
  • One participant shares frustration with the education system's structure, suggesting it limits students' ability to take advanced classes and learn challenging material.
  • There is a discussion about the accuracy of algebraic methods versus calculus methods for solving problems related to magnetic fields, with one participant questioning the claim that algebraic solutions are less accurate.
  • Another participant reassures that basic derivatives and integrals are manageable to learn if the individual is motivated to pursue calculus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the necessity of precalculus for learning calculus, the appropriateness of the educational system, and the accuracy of algebraic versus calculus methods for solving specific scientific problems. No consensus is reached on these issues.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge that the level of math required for certain scientific applications may exceed what is typically covered in an introductory calculus course, indicating a potential gap in knowledge for those aiming to solve complex problems.

Jewish_Vulcan
Messages
88
Reaction score
4
Hello I am in pre-calculus which is the next math class after algebra 2 and there are many scientific equations that require a knowledge of calculus to solve. For example I do science olympiad maglev and many of the equations to solve for magnetic flux or magnetic fields etc.. use derivatives and integrals. I was wondering if it would be too hard to learn integrals and derivitaves while still 2 years away from calculus.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My idea was always that you don't really need precalculus in order to study calculus. You can learn the relevant techniques on the side (and they would make much more sense!). The only thing you really need is a knowledge of trigonometry (meaning: some trigonometric identities), but you can get quite far without this.

I'd say you can start learning calculus right now. I recommend Lang's "A first course in calculus". It introduces the necessary concepts from precalculus (and perhaps even trig).
 
I expect the main reason you are "still 2 years away from calculus" is that your country's education system thinks it's too hard for kiddies to learn.

There's no reason why an bright 14 year old shouldn't be able to learn calculus IMO. If you can deal with algebra and trigonometry, that's all you need to get started.

But the level of math you need to "solve for magnetic flux or magnetic fields etc" is probably beyond a first calculus course, so getting to that level might take you a while (i.e. more than a year).
 
AlephZero said:
I expect the main reason you are "still 2 years away from calculus" is that your country's education system thinks it's too hard for kiddies to learn.

There's no reason why an bright 14 year old shouldn't be able to learn calculus IMO. If you can deal with algebra and trigonometry, that's all you need to get started.

But the level of math you need to "solve for magnetic flux or magnetic fields etc" is probably beyond a first calculus course, so getting to that level might take you a while (i.e. more than a year).
I totallly agree with you about the fact that the United States has an illogical education system. If it were up to me I would take the most challenging classes but there are to many dumb/lazy people that seem to represent most teenagers that make the school board not allow students to take challenging classes such as ap physics/ap chemistry as a sophmore. but I do try to learn classes over the summer. There are many illogical classes such as art that you have to take to graduate when you can be learning another science class instead.
 
Last edited:
AlephZero said:
But the level of math you need to "solve for magnetic flux or magnetic fields etc" is probably beyond a first calculus course, so getting to that level might take you a while (i.e. more than a year).
That is fine there are algebra versions of how to solve magnetic flux/fields but I wanted to learn it the proper way and I was told that the algebra versions are not as accurate as the calculus versions.
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by solving for those equations using algebra is less accurate than using calculus? As long as the problem is reasonably simplistic (which they should be at that level), algebra should be just fine.

That being said, if you really want to go ahead and learn calculus, basic derivatives and integrals are easy to learn.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
14K