Learning Refrigeration Cycle: Carnot, Real Life & Reversed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the refrigeration cycle, specifically the Carnot cycle, and its application in real-life refrigeration systems. Participants are exploring the principles of thermodynamics, including isothermal and adiabatic processes, as well as the implications of these processes in the context of heat transfer and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to explain the Carnot cycle and its reversibility, questioning why the cycle cannot operate in reverse. They are discussing the role of heat transfer during isothermal processes and the significance of phase transitions in real-life refrigeration.

Discussion Status

There is an active exchange of ideas, with some participants providing clarifications on the nature of the Carnot cycle and the conditions under which it operates. Questions about the relationship between heat transfer and temperature changes during isothermal processes are being explored, indicating a productive dialogue without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants have noted a lack of familiarity with the Second Law of Thermodynamics and entropy, which may affect their understanding of the concepts being discussed. Additionally, there are references to assumptions about ideal gases and the practical limitations of real-life refrigeration systems.

Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi, :smile:

So I am learning about how refrigerators work. First I have to show the Carnot cycle and explain why it does not work in reverse - from my understanding, it does not.

And then show how it actually works in real life, with the phase transitions, which I am guessing don't exist for ideal gases because the intermolecular forces are ignored - is this correct?

I find understanding the "real life" freezer O.K.. The problem is when it comes to the reverse Carnot cycle...

This is why I believe it does not work, and I would appreciate any help/corrections on what I said above and will write now:

If we look at the regular Carnot Cycle, the first part, that is: Isothermal contraction - the following occurs:

Δ U = 0 Because it is isothermal
Δ W = negative because work is being done on the gas, hence:

ΔQ = 0 - ΔW which means that the ΔQ is negative: Heat is transferred from the gas - heat is lost, and, in order for that to happen, the gas must be contact with a cold source.

Now if we revert the cycle and still keep the cold source where it is, this is what happens:

ΔU = 0
ΔW = positive because the gas is doing work

Therefore ΔQ = positive: The gas absorbs heat from a cold (I am assuming colder) surroundings, which is impossible

Is that it?

Thanks,
Peter G

P.S: I haven't done the Second Law of Thermodynamics yet, so I don't know about entropy. Furthermore, if any of you could explain how there is no temperature change in an isothermal situation even though heat energy is moving in and out? Maybe it is because it loses the heat to the surroundings as shown by:ΔQ = ΔW?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
Hi, :smile:

So I am learning about how refrigerators work. First I have to show the Carnot cycle and explain why it does not work in reverse - from my understanding, it does not.
A Carnot cycle is reversible. This means that the work done in moving heat from the cold reservoir to the hot reservoir in the Carnot refrigerator cycle can be recovered by running a Carnot heat engine between the hot and cold reservoirs.

And then show how it actually works in real life, with the phase transitions, which I am guessing don't exist for ideal gases because the intermolecular forces are ignored - is this correct?
A real life refrigerator uses Joule-Thomson cooling, which involves rapid expansion of an non-ideal gas, which is not reversible.

I find understanding the "real life" freezer O.K.. The problem is when it comes to the reverse Carnot cycle...

This is why I believe it does not work, and I would appreciate any help/corrections on what I said above and will write now:

If we look at the regular Carnot Cycle, the first part, that is: Isothermal contraction - the following occurs:

Δ U = 0 Because it is isothermal
Δ W = negative because work is being done on the gas, hence:

ΔQ = 0 - ΔW which means that the ΔQ is negative: Heat is transferred from the gas - heat is lost, and, in order for that to happen, the gas must be contact with a cold source.
No. The gas is in thermal contact with the hot reservoir which is at an infinitessimally lower temperature than the gas. At this point the gas is undergoing isothermal compression after having been adiabatically compressed. The adiabatic compression is to bring it from the temperature of the cold reservoir up to the temperature of the hot reservoir.

Now if we revert the cycle and still keep the cold source where it is, this is what happens:

ΔU = 0
ΔW = positive because the gas is doing work

Therefore ΔQ = positive: The gas absorbs heat from a cold (I am assuming colder) surroundings, which is impossible

Is that it?
No. In the reversed cycle, the gas is initially in thermal contact with the hot reservoir and has a temperature that is an infinitessimal amount lower than the hot reservoir. It expands as heat flows just enough to keep the temperature constant.
P.S: I haven't done the Second Law of Thermodynamics yet, so I don't know about entropy. Furthermore, if any of you could explain how there is no temperature change in an isothermal situation even though heat energy is moving in and out? Maybe it is because it loses the heat to the surroundings as shown by:ΔQ = ΔW?
That's right.
There is no temperature change because the gas expands and does work PdV = dQ.

AM
 
I don't understand for example, how in the regular Carnot Cycle, during Isothermal Compression, how, if heat is lost, is it in contact, as you said, with a hot reservoir? Furthermore, if it is an infinitesimally lower temperature, shouldn't it be a cold reservoir? Or am I confusing the terms
 
Peter G. said:
I don't understand for example, how in the regular Carnot Cycle, during Isothermal Compression, how, if heat is lost, is it in contact, as you said, with a hot reservoir? Furthermore, if it is an infinitesimally lower temperature, shouldn't it be a cold reservoir? Or am I confusing the terms
In a refrigerator, heat flows into the system from the cold reservoir and out of the system to the hot reservoir.

In the Carnot refrigerator heat is extracted from the cold reservoir during isothermal expansion. (This reversible isothermal expansion progresses infinitely slowly). Once expansion is complete, the gas undergoes an adiabatic compression until the gas reaches the temperature of the hot reservoir. It is then compressed isothermally and the heat flows to the hot reservoir. The gas is then adiabatically expanded until it is the temperature of the cold reservoir where it is then expanded isothermally and so on.

AM
 
Last edited:
Cool, I think I am almost there (I hope I am not bothering you too much :redface:)

These are my remaining doubts: In the regular Carnot Cycle:

In the "first step", that is, isothermal expansion, what is happening is: As the Gas does work, it's temperature *would* cool down, it therefore creates a temperature gradient and the internal energy is kept constant because it is being supplied with Heat from a Hot reservoir. That is how it gets heat. Correct? But why does the gas need the thermal energy, can't it do work without it? Or is it just part of the purpose of the engine? Transferring heat heat to a cold area?

Secondly, I don't understand the purpose of the adiabatic parts. Furthermore, when work is being done on the object all the work is used to raise the temperature right?

And last but not least (and I really hope this is not confusing - if it is, ignore it). I was watching this video and the guy explained the Carnot Cycle using as an example a gas container, containing an ideal gas and with rocks on top of the the container's piston. (Using the regular Carnot Cycle) During the process of expansion of the gas, being it adiabatic or isothermal, rocks were removed, allowing for an increase in volume and rocks were added during the compressions. I was trying and think in terms of this example, how work is done. So, this is my thought: Let's say the rocks start at a height A. During the period when the Gas is doing work, the rocks are raised to height B, which is well above A. Work however, is then done by us, compressing the gas, lowering the rocks to a height C. Height C is lower than B but higher than A, hence work is done.

Thanks,
Peter G.
 
Last edited:
Peter G. said:
Cool, I think I am almost there (I hope I am not bothering you too much :redface:)

These are my remaining doubts: In the regular Carnot Cycle:

In the "first step", that is, isothermal expansion, what is happening is: As the Gas does work, it's temperature *would* cool down, it therefore creates a temperature gradient and the internal energy is kept constant because it is being supplied with Heat from a Hot reservoir. That is how it gets heat. Correct? But why does the gas need the thermal energy, can't it do work without it? Or is it just part of the purpose of the engine? Transferring heat from a hot to cold area?
The purpose of the Carnot cycle is to create the most efficient engine, not the most practical. The system and surroundings are at equilibrium (ie an infinitessimal amount out of equilibrium) at all times. All heat flow occurs with the system and the reservoir it is in contact with are at the same temperature.

Secondly, I don't understand the purpose of the adiabatic parts. Furthermore, when work is being done on the object all the work is used to raise the temperature right?
In order to have heat flow isothermally to and from the system but also operate between two different temperatures (which is essential if you are to get work out of heat flow) you need to cease heat flow when the system changes from being in thermal contact with one reservoir to being in thermal contact with the other (different temperature) reservoir. This is done through adiabatic compression or expansion.
And last but not least (and I really hope this is not confusing - if it is, ignore it). I was watching this video and the guy explained the Carnot Cycle using as an example a gas container, containing an ideal gas and with rocks on top of the the container's piston. (Using the regular Carnot Cycle) During the process of expansion of the gas, being it adiabatic or isothermal, rocks were removed, allowing for an increase in volume and rocks were added during the compressions. I was trying and think in terms of this example, how work is done. So, this is my thought: Let's say the rocks start at a height A. During the period when the Gas is doing work, the rocks are raised to height B, which is well above A. Work however, is then done by us, compressing the gas, lowering the rocks to a height C. Height C is lower than B but higher than A, hence work is done.
This is how you would reverse the Carnot cycle. Store the work and then reverse the cycle using the stored work to drive the heat flow back to reach the initial starting condition.

AM
 
So the adiabatic process is there because when changing from one reservoir to the other we need to cease heat flow, as simple as that?

And I still don't quite get why thermal energy moves in during the beginning of the cycle (Isothermal Expansion). Can't the gas do work without it? I think I have this doubt because I don't understand the function of the heat engine...
 
Peter G. said:
So the adiabatic process is there because when changing from one reservoir to the other we need to cease heat flow, as simple as that?

And I still don't quite get why thermal energy moves in during the beginning of the cycle (Isothermal Expansion). Can't the gas do work without it? I think I have this doubt because I don't understand the function of the heat engine...
You have to get heat to flow into the engine. The heat engine uses natural heat flow to generate work. Heat flow naturally occurs from hotter to colder. So you need a slight temperature difference between the hot reservoir and system so that the heat flows into the system from the hot register, isothermally.

This heat flow causes the engine to do work: dW = dQ (dU = 0). The system gas then expands adiabatically doing further work. At the point that system temperature reaches the cold reservoir temperature, thermal contact is made with the cold reservoir and heat flows out of the gas. Work is done on the gas compressing it letting the heat flow out of the gas isothermally to the cold reservoir. It is then compressed adiabatically to get back to the starting position. You can show on a PV diagram that less work is required to do the compression phase than was done by the gas in the expansion phase. The difference is the work produced by the engine.

AM
 
Thank you A LOT for your help and patience. I got it now
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K