So I am learning how to use the method of least squares to find the best fit straight line and there is this one part in the derivation I do not fully understand and I was wondering if anyone could help me out.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So basically we start out with the residuals of the equation of a straight line..

[tex]y_i-mx_i-c[/tex]

And now we take the root mean square of these residuals and try to find the minimum points of m and c by taking the partial derivatives.

[tex]\Sigma (y_i-mx_i-c)^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial S}{\partial m}=-2\Sigma x_i(y_i-mx_i-c)=0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial S}{\partial c}=-2\Sigma (y_i-mx_i-c)=0[/tex]

Now from the second equation it is easy to see that

[tex]c=\overline{y}-m\overline{x}[/tex]

since

[tex]\overline{y}=\frac{1}{n}\Sigma y_i[/tex]

and

[tex]\overline{x}=\frac{1}{n}\Sigma x_i[/tex]

Solving the first equation for m we get..

[tex]m=\frac{\Sigma x_i y_i -c\Sigma x_i}{\Sigma x_i ^2}[/tex]

The part I do not understand is the book says that m is equal to..

[tex]m=\frac{\Sigma (x_i-\overline{x})y_i}{\Sigma (x_i-\overline{x})^2}[/tex]

I feel like I must be missing something simple due to the books lack of explaination. Can anyone help me get this formula from the one I got for m? Why did the [itex]x_i[/itex]'s turn into [itex](x_i-\overline{x})[/itex]'s?? Did they made c=0 for some reason? Any help would be appreciated!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Least Squares Derivation question

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**