Lebesgue Inequality: Prove from Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter henry22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
henry22
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show from definition that if f is measurable on [a,b], with m<=f(x)<=M for all x then its lebesgue integral, I, satisfies

m(b-a)<=I<=M(b-a)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the definition is that f:[a,b]->R is measurable if for each t in R the set {x in [a,b] :f(x)>c} is measurable.

But I don't see how this helps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do I need to use a summation somewhere?