Understand Lemma Lucas Theorem & Its Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter Max.Planck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of Lemma Lucas Theorem, which states that for a prime number p and an integer k such that 1 ≤ k ≤ p-1, the binomial coefficient {p choose k} is congruent to 0 modulo p. The proof is established by demonstrating that p divides the numerator p! but does not divide the denominators k! and (p-k)!, confirming that there are no factors of p in the denominator to cancel out the p in the numerator. Participants agree on the validity of the proof and emphasize the importance of understanding the prime factorization involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binomial coefficients, specifically {n choose k}
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic and congruences
  • Familiarity with prime factorization and properties of prime numbers
  • Basic combinatorial mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of binomial coefficients in modular arithmetic
  • Explore advanced topics in number theory, particularly Lucas' Theorem
  • Learn about combinatorial proofs and their applications
  • Investigate the implications of prime factorization in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in combinatorial proofs and modular arithmetic.

Max.Planck
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Hi. I don't understand the following proof.
Lemma
Let p be a prime number and 1<=k<=p-1, then:
{p \choose k} \equiv 0 \pmod{p}

Proof

{p \choose k} = \frac{p!}{k!(p-k)!}. Since p | p! but p \not | k! \land p \not | (p-k)! the proof follows.

I think here what you want to show is that p divides the binomial coefficient, but how does the proof do that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming p is prime. Do you agree that p divides p! and that p does not divide k! and that p does not divide (p-k)! ?

If so, then p must divide p choose k since there are no factors of p in the denominator that would "cancel" the p in the numerator.

As a side note, I would suggest not using the wedge things in a proof (or at all.) They are confusing.
 
Robert1986 said:
I am assuming p is prime. Do you agree that p divides p! and that p does not divide k! and that p does not divide (p-k)! ?
Agreed.
Robert1986 said:
If so, then p must divide p choose k since there are no factors of p in the denominator that would "cancel" the p in the numerator.
I don't understand this.
Robert1986 said:
As a side note, I would suggest not using the wedge things in a proof (or at all.) They are confusing.
Ok thanks.
 
##k## and ##(p-k)## are both less than ##p##.

So, all the prime factors of ##k\,!## and of ##(p-k)!## are less than ##p##.

##p## is a prime, so ##p## can't divide a number whose prime factors are all less than ##p##.
 
AlephZero said:
##k## and ##(p-k)## are both less than ##p##.

So, all the prime factors of ##k\,!## and of ##(p-k)!## are less than ##p##.

##p## is a prime, so ##p## can't divide a number whose prime factors are all less than ##p##.

Doesnt this imply that p does not divide p choose k?
 
It means that p divides the numerator of the fraction but not the denominator. So, p divides the fraction.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Robert1986 said:
It means that p divides the numerator of the fraction but not the denominator. So, p divides the fraction.

Ah of course, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
653
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K