A Lesser Green's function

rbphysics
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Physical interpretation of Lesser green function G<(t,t') for both t>t' and t<t'.
The lesser Green's function is defined as:
$$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state.
$$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$
First consider the case t <t'
Define,
$$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$
$$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$
$$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$
##\ket{\alpha}## is the state of the system at time t' given that a hole was created at single particle state ##\nu## at earlier time t. And ##\ket{\beta}## is the state of the system at time t' given that a hole is created at state ##\nu## at that instant. It gives me good physical interpretation that lesser function for t<t' is proportional to probability amplitude for the hole created at time t in state ##\nu## would remain in state nu at time t' also.
Now consider t>t'
Define,
$$\ket{\alpha}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}\\$$
$$\ket{\beta}=e^{-iH(t-t')}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}\\$$
$$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$
##\ket{\alpha}## is the state of the system at time t with hole created at that instant and ##\ket{\beta}## is the state of the system at time t with hole created at earlier time t' . What does physical interpretation now it have? What are forward and backward propagation often described in time.
 

Attachments

  • 1000451682.webp
    1000451682.webp
    18.3 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
@rbphysics posting images of equations and text you want to discuss is not permitted. Please post your equations and text directly, using LaTeX for equations. You'll find a "LaTeX Guide" link at the bottom left of each post window.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top