Let's make some single-domain magnetic nanoparticles

  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetic
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the critical size of spherical single-domain magnetic nanoparticles to prevent the formation of additional domains. The energy calculations for these nanoparticles are explored, particularly the relationship between stray field energy and domain wall energy. There is interest in simplifying these calculations, possibly starting with a one-dimensional approach, and references to the Ising model are made as a potential framework. Participants also mention practical applications of single-domain particles in MRI and historical uses in magnetic tapes. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for further exploration and calculation in this area of magnetic nanoparticle stability.
etotheipi
Might be interesting, to determine how small a spherical single-domain nanoparticle needs to be in order for it to be stable against forming more domains. The energy of such a nanoparticle (occupying a spherical region ##\Omega##) will be$$E_1 = -\frac{\mu_0}{2}\int_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{M}_0 \cdot \boldsymbol{H} d\tau = \frac{\mu_0}{2} \int_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{M}_0 \cdot \nabla U d\tau$$where ##\boldsymbol{H} = - \nabla U## where ##\nabla^2 U = \nabla \cdot \boldsymbol{M}_0##. [This stray field energy we expect to scale ##\propto r^3##]. Let's then consider forming a second domain, and forming a domain wall [at some energy cost] along the equatorial plane. Then, in one hemisphere the magnetisation is ##\mathbf{M}_0##, and in the other ##-\mathbf{M}_0##. Denoting ##\Omega = \Omega_1 \cup \Omega_2##,$$E_2 = \underbrace{\frac{\mu_0}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{2} \int_{\Omega_i} (-1)^i \boldsymbol{M}_0 \cdot \nabla U d\tau}_{\text{stray field}} + \underbrace{E_{\text{bloch}}}_{\text{domain wall}}$$To be stable against forming a second domain, it's required that ##E_2 > E_1##. Forming more domains reduces stray field but at the cost of increasing domain wall energy, so the aim is to find that critical radius.

I would like some help to flesh out this calculation! Firstly, I expect the domain wall energy to scale ##\propto r^2## as the domain wall area, but how can I determine an explicit expression for this? Also, what approximations are justified, in order to simplify the determination of the stray field energy? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about doing something in 1D first? I am not at all expert here but aren't you going to end up with the Ising model or similar? This is a very interesting question but by no means a new one.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
I didn't even know what the Ising model was until about 1 minute and 30 seconds ago, but it does look cool. I'm sure Professor Tong has written some notes about them, somewhere [EDIT: yes, he has, under 'statistical field theory' 😁]. I'm not familiar with this field so I don't know what tools are available or what models already exist. But open to suggestions :smile:

What do you mean by trying something in 1D first?
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
Check the Ising model stuff. I know the questions were usually regarding phase transitions (order-disorder). The 1D models are just a string of interacting spins with some temperature maybe? This led to much of Ken Wilsons renormalization group. Enough here to last a lifetime! Wish I knew more.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Okay cool, thanks, looks like I've got a bit of reading to do... better go and make a cup of tea first 😌
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
etotheipi said:
I would like some help to flesh out this calculation!
This seems like an interesting calculation. In MRI we use super-paramagnetic iron oxide which consists of iron oxide particles that are small enough to consist of a single domain. So you can use the size of those as a check
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes nasu, anorlunda, Motore and 2 others
Single domain particles were used in the magnetic coatings of the old magnetic tapes. You can find a lot of relating info by looking up magnetic recording. And iron oxide was the most common material too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
858
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K