Let's say I have a container and it has an opening. I drop it into the

In summary, a container with a movable wall that can be opened and closed to the ocean would be pressurized to some extent. The container would deform in response to this pressure, so the pressure inside will no longer be as high. The geometry and material of the container will determine the extent of this equalization. The water would have compressed much less than an equal amount of gas. There is no guarantee that decompression (upon opening the container) will be "violent."
  • #1
D9 XTC
30
0
Let's say I have a container and it has an opening. I drop it into the ocean and let it sink to the bottom of the deepest part about 36k feet down. Now it's at the bottom and full of water and I seal it then I bring it back to the surface. If I open it will it decompress pretty violently since the pressure at the bottom of the ocean is 8 tons psi and at sea level it's 14.7 lbs psi?

Sorry if this is obvious...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


The container will be pressurized to some extent when you bring it to the surface, assuming no leaks. But the container will deform in response to this pressure, so the pressure inside will no longer be as high. The geometry and material of the container will determine the extent of this equalization. Also, the water will have compressed much less than an equal amount of gas. For both of these reasons, there's no guarantee that decompression (upon opening the container) will be "violent." Does this make sense?
 
  • #3


The violence of the explosion will depend upon the amount of strain energy that is involved. The stored energy will be proportional to the product of the pressure change and the volume change. If the container just contains water then the amount of expansion will be fairly small so the energy involved will not be a lot. If you use a gas, the energy stored would be much much more - that could cause a nasty accident if the container fails.

When they pressure test diving cylinders, they fill them with water and measure how much they expand under the test pressure. If the cylinder does, actually, rupture, there is not much harm done. If they did the test with compressed air, there would be mand MJ of stored energy and it could take out the workshop!
 
  • #4


Very interesting and thanks for the answers guys. My goal is to see if a violent jet of water can be shot out of a container just by using hydrostatic pressure.

So going off from your input tell me how this scenario would go.

Let's say we have a large non deformable container in the shape of a cylinder. One side has a door that can be opened and closed to the ocean. The cylinder is divided in half internally by a movable wall (basically like a cylinder head). On the side of the divided cylinder that has no door a highly pressurized gas is pumped in so now the cylindar head travels closest to the side that the door is at. Phew...

Okay, so we drop it into the ocean to 36k feet. The hydrostatic pressure should compress the already highly compressed gas even further. Depending on how big the surface area is of the movable wall the amount of hydrostactic pressure pushing on it could be huge.

So we seal it up and bring it back to sea level and open a special alternate door built into the door that narrows the flow of water to make a jet.

Would this be a nasty jet of water then if the gas pressure is huge on the other side of the moveable wall and is pushing the water out?
 
  • #5


Yes, of course you would get a squirt of water at very high pressure - there would be a lot of stored energy in the compressed gas.
I have a feeling that you may be thinking you would get all this energy for free. In fact you wouldn't because more work would be put into raising the compressed container up than any energy you may have been able to store up whilst lowering it. The upthrust / buoyancy would be less on the way up than on the way down.

Your scenario of an incompressible container is not real, either. The material would compress somewhat. Nothing - including all liquids and solids - has an infinite modulus. It would be much greater than the gas it contains, though.

I didn't quite get the point of pre-compressing the gas first?
 
  • #6


Of course, if the pre-compression is equal to the compression potential of being 36 thousand feet underwater, there would be no additional compression.
 
  • #7


D9 XTC said:
My goal is to see if a violent jet of water can be shot out of a container just by using hydrostatic pressure.

You might be interested in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_jet_cutter" [Broken] (no ocean required!).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What will happen to the container when I drop it into the opening?

When you drop the container into the opening, it will fall through the opening and likely land on the surface below. The specific movement and result will depend on factors such as the size and weight of the container, the size and shape of the opening, and the surface it lands on.

2. Will the container break when I drop it into the opening?

It is possible that the container could break upon impact with the surface below, depending on the strength and durability of the material it is made of. If the container is made of a fragile material like glass, it is more likely to break compared to a container made of a stronger material like metal.

3. How will the container's movement be affected by the opening?

The container's movement will be affected by the size, shape, and location of the opening. A larger opening will allow the container to fall through more easily, while a smaller or irregularly shaped opening may cause the container to spin or change direction as it falls. The location of the opening on the container can also impact its movement, as a top or side opening will cause the container to fall differently than a bottom opening.

4. Can I control the container's movement as it falls through the opening?

In most cases, it is difficult to control the container's movement as it falls through the opening. However, factors such as the shape and weight distribution of the container, as well as the size and location of the opening, may allow for some level of control. For example, a container with a parachute attached may be able to glide through the opening rather than simply falling straight down.

5. What other factors should I consider when dropping a container into an opening?

In addition to the container and the opening itself, other factors that may affect the outcome include the surrounding environment, such as wind or other objects in the area, and any external forces applied to the container, such as pushing or throwing it. It is important to carefully consider these factors in order to predict and understand the behavior of the container as it falls through the opening.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top