Let's say I have a container and it has an opening. I drop it into the

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter D9 XTC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Container Drop
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the effects of hydrostatic pressure on a sealed container submerged at 36,000 feet in the ocean. The container, filled with water and containing a highly pressurized gas, experiences compression due to the immense external pressure. Upon returning to sea level and opening a specially designed door, a jet of water can be expelled due to the pressure differential, but the energy stored in the compressed gas is critical to the intensity of the jet. The conversation highlights the importance of container material properties and the principles of pressure and energy storage in determining the outcome of such a scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic pressure and its effects
  • Knowledge of gas laws and pressure differentials
  • Familiarity with material science, particularly the properties of gases and liquids under pressure
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics and jet propulsion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of hydrostatic pressure and its applications in engineering
  • Explore the behavior of gases under varying pressure conditions, including Boyle's Law
  • Study the design and function of water jet cutters for practical applications
  • Investigate material properties relevant to pressure vessels, including deformation and failure modes
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in fluid dynamics, pressure vessel design, or applications of hydrostatic pressure in real-world scenarios.

D9 XTC
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a container and it has an opening. I drop it into the ocean and let it sink to the bottom of the deepest part about 36k feet down. Now it's at the bottom and full of water and I seal it then I bring it back to the surface. If I open it will it decompress pretty violently since the pressure at the bottom of the ocean is 8 tons psi and at sea level it's 14.7 lbs psi?

Sorry if this is obvious...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The container will be pressurized to some extent when you bring it to the surface, assuming no leaks. But the container will deform in response to this pressure, so the pressure inside will no longer be as high. The geometry and material of the container will determine the extent of this equalization. Also, the water will have compressed much less than an equal amount of gas. For both of these reasons, there's no guarantee that decompression (upon opening the container) will be "violent." Does this make sense?
 


The violence of the explosion will depend upon the amount of strain energy that is involved. The stored energy will be proportional to the product of the pressure change and the volume change. If the container just contains water then the amount of expansion will be fairly small so the energy involved will not be a lot. If you use a gas, the energy stored would be much much more - that could cause a nasty accident if the container fails.

When they pressure test diving cylinders, they fill them with water and measure how much they expand under the test pressure. If the cylinder does, actually, rupture, there is not much harm done. If they did the test with compressed air, there would be mand MJ of stored energy and it could take out the workshop!
 


Very interesting and thanks for the answers guys. My goal is to see if a violent jet of water can be shot out of a container just by using hydrostatic pressure.

So going off from your input tell me how this scenario would go.

Let's say we have a large non deformable container in the shape of a cylinder. One side has a door that can be opened and closed to the ocean. The cylinder is divided in half internally by a movable wall (basically like a cylinder head). On the side of the divided cylinder that has no door a highly pressurized gas is pumped in so now the cylindar head travels closest to the side that the door is at. Phew...

Okay, so we drop it into the ocean to 36k feet. The hydrostatic pressure should compress the already highly compressed gas even further. Depending on how big the surface area is of the movable wall the amount of hydrostactic pressure pushing on it could be huge.

So we seal it up and bring it back to sea level and open a special alternate door built into the door that narrows the flow of water to make a jet.

Would this be a nasty jet of water then if the gas pressure is huge on the other side of the moveable wall and is pushing the water out?
 


Yes, of course you would get a squirt of water at very high pressure - there would be a lot of stored energy in the compressed gas.
I have a feeling that you may be thinking you would get all this energy for free. In fact you wouldn't because more work would be put into raising the compressed container up than any energy you may have been able to store up whilst lowering it. The upthrust / buoyancy would be less on the way up than on the way down.

Your scenario of an incompressible container is not real, either. The material would compress somewhat. Nothing - including all liquids and solids - has an infinite modulus. It would be much greater than the gas it contains, though.

I didn't quite get the point of pre-compressing the gas first?
 


Of course, if the pre-compression is equal to the compression potential of being 36 thousand feet underwater, there would be no additional compression.
 


D9 XTC said:
My goal is to see if a violent jet of water can be shot out of a container just by using hydrostatic pressure.

You might be interested in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_jet_cutter" (no ocean required!).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K