Liénard-Wiechert potential derivation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Snaab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Liénard-Wiechert potential for a moving point charge, specifically addressing the current density in different frames. The user, Snaab, questions the absence of the Lorentz factor γ in the current density transformation. The response clarifies that the missing γ is incorporated within the delta function transformation, specifically using the identity δ(x) = c δ(cx), leading to δ(r) = (1/γ)δ(r'). This highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between the delta function and Lorentz transformations in classical field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with the Liénard-Wiechert potential
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations
  • Basic grasp of 4-current density notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Liénard-Wiechert potential in detail
  • Learn about delta function properties and their transformations
  • Explore Lorentz transformations in the context of electromagnetism
  • Investigate the implications of 4-current density in different reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on classical field theory and electromagnetism, will benefit from this discussion.

Snaab
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm studying some classical field theory, and I have a question about the derivation of the Liénard-Wiechert potential for a moving point charge, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liénard–Wiechert_potential#Derivation" for the derivation and the meaning of the symbols I use.

The current density in the observing frame is said to be given by:
j^\mu (\mathbf{r},t) = e(1,\mathbf{v_0}) \delta(\mathbf{r'} - \mathbf{r_0}(t)).

Now comes my question.
In the stationary frame, the 4-current density should be given by:
j^\mu(\mathbf{r}) = (c e \delta(\mathbf{r}),0)

So, when this gets boosted, shouldn't one have the following current density:
j^\mu = (\gamma c e \delta(\mathbf{r'} - \mathbf{r_0}(t)), \gamma e \mathbf{v_0}\delta(\mathbf{r'} - \mathbf{r_0}(t)))

In other words, why isn't there a factor \gamma in the density like posed on wikipedia? Also in my own literature there is no such factor.

Cheers,

Snaab
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The missing γ has been swallowed by the delta function. There's a γ in the transformation from r to r', and one must use the identity δ(x) = c δ(cx). In other words, δ(r) = (1/γ)δ(r').
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
632
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
895
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
714
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
757
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K