Light fluctuations and finding exoplanets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential use of light fluctuations from stars to detect exoplanets, specifically through the analysis of high-frequency intensity variations in starlight. Participants explore the feasibility of using autocorrelation techniques to identify correlations between a star's light fluctuations and the reflected light from orbiting planets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that autocorrelation of a star's light fluctuations could reveal the presence of exoplanets by identifying time delays corresponding to the distance of the planets.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism, suggesting that the fluctuations would be too small and buried in noise, requiring a significantly large telescope to achieve a high enough signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to detect any correlation.
  • Some participants note that while photon counting noise is relatively easy to estimate, the spectrum of fluctuations from different stars is less predictable, indicating variability in the potential for this method across different types of stars.
  • There is a reiteration of the challenge posed by noise, emphasizing that while it can be estimated, it cannot be completely removed, which complicates the detection of small fluctuations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the challenges posed by noise and the need for large telescopes, but there is disagreement regarding the feasibility of using light fluctuations for exoplanet detection, with some expressing optimism about the method and others remaining skeptical.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the estimation of noise and the variability of star characteristics, which may affect the applicability of the proposed method.

Paul Colby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
499
All light sources fluctuate and I've wondered if auto correlation of the natural fluctuation of a star's output might be used to range it's planets? The concept is to stare at a star (like Kepler does) and record high frequency intensity fluctuations say at a sample rate of 10 times per second. Fluctuations at this rate which are not due to intervening dust would have to arise from very small features on the photosphere of the star. An exoplanet in the correct phase would be illuminated by some of the same star light and would reflect light with the same time fluctuations. One then computes the time auto correlation function. In principle there would be a peak in correlation at a time delay equal to the path difference (8ish minutes for an Earth like planet) with a correlation magnitude proportional to the phase and albedo of the planet.

Okay, the off the cuff answer is "what are you on crack?" stars are really really big. Everything averages to zero in that frequency band so no, can't work.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'd expect any such signal to be buried deep in the noise of the starlight, so you'd need a HUGE telescope to get a SNR high enough to see any correlation.
 
Drakkith said:
I'd expect any such signal to be buried deep in the noise of the starlight, so you'd need a HUGE telescope to get a SNR high enough to see any correlation.
Yes, I expect this is the case for most stars like the sun for example. The photon counting noise is easy to estimate but the spectrum of fluctuations of a star much less so. Not all stars are the same. What Kepler light curves I've seen don't seem dominated by photon statistics but this is just a guess on my part.
 
Paul Colby said:
Yes, I expect this is the case for most stars like the sun for example. The photon counting noise is easy to estimate but the spectrum of fluctuations of a star much less so. Not all stars are the same. What Kepler light curves I've seen don't seem dominated by photon statistics but this is just a guess on my part.

That's the thing about noise. You can estimate it all you want. But you cannot remove it. Hence the need for large telescopes to get that SNR high enough to see those small fluctuations!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K