Light wave Interference - Angler Fish Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to light wave interference and the bioluminescence of angler fish. The problem involves calculating the wavelength of light emitted by the fish, considering the indices of refraction for water, a film, and glass. There is some debate about the accuracy of the index of refraction for water, with one participant noting that the typical value is 1.33, while the problem states 1.10. Despite this discrepancy, the solution approach using the provided values is deemed correct by another participant. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adhering to the problem's parameters while solving.
aatari
Messages
73
Reaction score
3
Hi Guys, I have attempted to solve the following question and was hoping someone can have a look and give some feedback. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

1. Homework Statement

Angler fish emit light through bioluminescence. An angler fish is swimming in a fish tank that has a film on the inside of the glass. The water in the tank has an index of refraction of 1.10, the film has an index of refraction of 1.21 and the glass has an index of refraction of 1.40. The film is 90.0 nm thick, and is such that the light reflecting back at the angler fish has been minimized. Find the wavelength of the angler fish’s light.

Homework Equations


PD = (n − ½)λ
λ = 2t(2n)

The Attempt at a Solution


20180118_175742[62645].jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20180118_175742[62645].jpg
    20180118_175742[62645].jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 1,448
Physics news on Phys.org
Water normally has an index of refraction of ## n= 1.33 ##. An index of ## n=1.10 ## is not correct. You can solve for the wavelength that such a film will result in being an anti-reflection coating for the information as given, but it is very hypothetical.
 
  • Like
Likes aatari
Charles Link said:
Water normally has an index of refraction of ## n= 1.33 ##. An index of ## n=1.10 ## is not correct. You can solve for the wavelength that such a film will result in being an anti-reflection coating for the information as given, but it is very hypothetical.
That is true that water has the index of refraction n = 1.33. However, since the question uses the value of n = 1.10, I am using that to solve the problem.

So other than that is my solution correct?
 
aatari said:
That is true that water has the index of refraction n = 1.33. However, since the question uses the value of n = 1.10, I am using that to solve the problem.

So other than that is my solution correct?
For the information given, your solution looks correct.
 
  • Like
Likes aatari
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K