MHB Limit in Infinity: Check Results Now

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexstrasuz1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating two limits, where one participant initially calculated e^3/0, mistakenly interpreting it as e^(infinity). They later corrected their error, confirming that the first limit should yield e^3, while the second limit correctly results in e^(-5/2) as verified by Wolfram Alpha. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate calculations in limit evaluations. The participant expresses gratitude for the clarification regarding their mistake. Overall, the thread emphasizes the significance of double-checking mathematical results.
Alexstrasuz1
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Mathematics news on Phys.org
According to wolfram alpha you should get $e^3$ for the first limit and indeed $e^{\frac{-5}{2}}$ for the second one.
 
Oh yes it is 3 I made mistake with dividing, ty
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top