Limit of a function as x goes to 1

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nothingkwt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the function f(x) = (1 - cos(x-1)) / (x-1)² as x approaches 1 is definitively 1/2. To evaluate this limit without using L'Hospital's rule, a Taylor series expansion for cos(x-1) around x=1 is utilized. The series expansion is given by cos(x-1) ≈ 1 - (x-1)²/2! + (x-1)⁴/4! + ..., which simplifies the numerator and allows for cancellation of terms. This method effectively demonstrates the limit's value through the leading order expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series expansions
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Taylor series expansions in detail
  • Learn about limits and continuity in calculus
  • Explore trigonometric function approximations
  • Review techniques for evaluating limits without L'Hospital's rule
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians exploring limit evaluation techniques, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical analysis.

nothingkwt
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
f(x) = 1-cos(x-1) / (x-1)2

Can someone please explain how this can be done other than L'Hospital's rule? I tried but I just don't understand how. I know the answer is 1/2 though.

I tried separating to 2 limits but i got ∞ - ∞ and that is obviously wrong but I don't know what my mistake was.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could do this by doing a series expansion for the numerator and looking at the limit of the leading order expression. This is a useful series expansion:

cos(x-1) ≈ 1 - (x-1)2/2! + (x-1)4/4! + ...
This is basically the definition of cosine, but you can get it through taylor expansion about x=1. Note that as x goes to 1, the higher order terms are negligible.
If you plug this into the numerator of your expression, you get some nice cancellation happening.
 
There are brackets missing for the numerator, I think.

If you know good upper and lower estimates for cos() around 0, you can use them. The full taylor series is the better solution, if you can use that.
 
A Taylor's Series expansion seems to me to be the way to go.
 
Mark44 said:
A Taylor's Series expansion seems to me to be the way to go.

How would you go about even expressing that as a taylor series o.O
 
iRaid, can you express cos(x-1) as a Taylor series around x=1?

Actually Jolb has it above, but it doesn't do much if you don't know why that is what it is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K