Limit of K-Roots in Pascal's Triangle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bolle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Root Terms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit of a ratio of even to odd numbers in Pascal's Triangle, particularly focusing on the behavior of this ratio as the number of rows approaches infinity. Participants explore mathematical expressions and limits related to this ratio, engaging in technical reasoning and calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for the ratio of even to odd numbers in Pascal's Triangle for 2k-1 rows, suggesting it grows exponentially.
  • The same participant proposes a limit to determine the base of this growth, leading to a complex expression that they believe approaches (4/3).
  • Another participant suggests that the limit can be evaluated using properties of continuous functions, asserting that the limit of a continuous function at a point can be evaluated directly.
  • Further contributions include inequalities related to the limit and thoughts on the continuity of the function involved, with one participant reflecting on their understanding of real analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the evaluation of the limit and the properties of the functions involved. There is no consensus on the rigorous approach to taking the limit or the implications of continuity in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the continuity of functions and the epsilon-delta definition of limits, indicating a reliance on foundational concepts in analysis. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions about the behavior of terms as k approaches infinity.

bolle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Me and a friend was contemplating the ratio of even to odd number in Pascals triangle. After some thought we arrived at a ratio like this when looking at a triangle of 2k-1 rows.

[itex]\frac{2^{2k-3}+2^{k-2}}{3^{k-1}} - 1[/itex]

As expected, this ratio grows exponentially. (I.e. almost all numbers in Pascals triangle will be even) However, we then started to wonder with what base this will grow, I.e. we wondered about

[itex]\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} (\frac{2^{2k-3}+2^{k-2}}{3^{k-1}} - 1)^\frac{1}{k}[/itex]

After some calculations we got it reduced to

[itex]\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \frac{4}{3}(2^{\log_23-3}+2^{\log_23-2-k} - 2^{-k(2-\log_23)})^\frac{1}{k}[/itex]

Now, we believe this to be (4/3) but we get stuck with the limit

[itex]\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} [\frac{3}{8} +\frac{3}{2^{k+2}} - \frac{3^k}{4^k}]^\frac{1}{k}[/itex]

Our thinking is that the last two terms within the brackets will be small so that this is somewhat like taking

[itex]\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty} (\frac{3}{8})^{\frac{1}{k}}=1[/itex]?

and hence that the base tends to (4/3)? Empirically, this seems to be the case. However, how to you take this limit with mathematical rigour?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Not that it answers your problem, but it will make formatting much easier: LaTeX guide.
 


Thanks, I didn't know it was available. I'm new to forums like these.
 


Hey bolle and welcome to the forums.

I'm pretty sure that since this function is continuous across the interval (since 3/8 > 0) you can basically treat it as an evaluation of f(1/k) where f(x) = a^x as k -> infinity which means it will just be a^0 = 1.

The reason you can do this is because for a continuous function the limit is equal to the value of that function (this is actually how you define continuity rigorously in analysis).

So as long as you have this property, it's basically a thing where you just evaluate the limit and plug that in for the function (but it has to be continuous).

We know this is continuous and smooth since you can take the derivative of (3/8)^x and it is also a smooth function.

Whenever you can't be sure when something is continuous or not, then you need to use the epsilon-delta definition of a limit to find out. You also need to consider when the limit gives a non-finite value (like infinity or negative infinity) or whether the limit doesn't even exist (the right hand limit is not equal to the left hand limit).
 


[itex]\frac {3}{8} - \frac{3^k}{4^k} \lt \frac{3}{8} +\frac{3}{2^{k+2}} - \frac{3^k}{4^k} \lt \frac{3}{8} + \frac{3}{2^{k+2}}[/itex]

For [itex]k > 1, f(x) = x^{\frac{1}{k}}[/itex] are there inequalities comparing

[itex]f(a + b)[/itex] to [itex]f(a) + f(b)[/itex] and [itex]f( p - q)[/itex] to [itex]f(p) - f(q)[/itex] when [itex]p - q > 0[/itex] ?

Thiis isn't a real hint. I'm just thinking out loud.
 


Stephen Tashi said:
[itex]\frac {3}{8} - \frac{3^k}{4^k} \lt \frac{3}{8} +\frac{3}{2^{k+2}} - \frac{3^k}{4^k} \lt \frac{3}{8} + \frac{3}{2^{k+2}}[/itex]

You are of course correct. We can enclose the limit in this way. I seem to have completely forgotten my real analysis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K