Limit proof (using delta-epsilon definition)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the limit of the product of two functions, specifically that if lim(x->c) f(x) = L and lim(x->c) g(x) = M, then lim(x->c) f(x)g(x) = LM using the epsilon-delta definition. The main approach involves manipulating the expression |f(x)g(x) - LM| using the triangle inequality and establishing bounds for |f(x) - L| and |g(x) - M|. The participants suggest defining epsilon1 and epsilon2 for the two limits and exploring alternative manipulations to isolate the problematic terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Triangle inequality in real analysis
  • Basic properties of limits
  • Understanding of function continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth
  • Learn about the triangle inequality and its applications in proofs
  • Explore the concept of continuity and its implications for limits
  • Investigate alternative proofs for the product of limits theorem
USEFUL FOR

Students studying real analysis, particularly those tackling limit proofs, as well as educators looking for effective teaching strategies for the epsilon-delta definition.

dancergirlie
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f, g : A \rightarrow R be functions and let c \in R be a limit point of A. Assume that lim(x-> c): f(x) = L
and lim(x->c): g(x) = M. Use the epsilon-delta definition to prove:
lim(x->c) f(x)g(x)=LM


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


alright in order to prove this, for epsilon>0, I need to find a delta>0 so that for 0<|x-c|<delta,
|f(x)g(x)-LM|<epsilon.

This is what I tried so far:

|f(x)g(x)-LM|= |f(x)g(x)-Lg(x)+Lg(x)-LM|= |(f(x)-L)(g(x))+L(g(x)-M)|
By the triangle inequality, that is less than or equal to:

|(f(x)-L)(g(x)|+|L(g(x)-M)|= |f(x)-L||g(x)| + |L||g(x)-M|

Well I know that since lim(x->c) f(x)=L, that means for epsilon>0 there exists a delta(1) so that for 0<|x-c|<delta(1)
|f(x)-L|<epsilon

and also since lim(x->c) g(x)=M, that means for epsilon>0 there exists a delta(2) so that for 0<|x-c|<delta(2)
|g(x)-M|<epsilon

For |f(x)-L||g(x)| + |L||g(x)-M|, I am trying to make each part at most equal to epsilon/2.

This is where I get stuck, I don't know what to do with |f(x)-L||g(x)|, because g(x) isn't a constant... any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dancergirlie said:

Homework Statement


Let f, g : A \rightarrow R be functions and let c \in R be a limit point of A. Assume that lim(x-> c): f(x) = L
and lim(x->c): g(x) = M. Use the epsilon-delta definition to prove:
lim(x->c) f(x)g(x)=LM


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


alright in order to prove this, for epsilon>0, I need to find a delta>0 so that for 0<|x-c|<delta,
|f(x)g(x)-LM|<epsilon.

This is what I tried so far:

|f(x)g(x)-LM|= |f(x)g(x)-Lg(x)+Lg(x)-LM|= |(f(x)-L)(g(x))+L(g(x)-M)|
By the triangle inequality, that is less than or equal to:

|(f(x)-L)(g(x)|+|L(g(x)-M)|= |f(x)-L||g(x)| + |L||g(x)-M|

Well I know that since lim(x->c) f(x)=L, that means for epsilon>0 there exists a delta(1) so that for 0<|x-c|<delta(1)
|f(x)-L|<epsilon

and also since lim(x->c) g(x)=M, that means for epsilon>0 there exists a delta(2) so that for 0<|x-c|<delta(2)
|g(x)-M|<epsilon

For |f(x)-L||g(x)| + |L||g(x)-M|, I am trying to make each part at most equal to epsilon/2.

This is where I get stuck, I don't know what to do with |f(x)-L||g(x)|, because g(x) isn't a constant... any help would be great!
You may want to define epsilon1 and epsilon2 applied to the two separate limits. I think you'll have to again use the closeness of g(x) to M in the part where you are stuck so that epsilon1 (for f) is also a function of epsilon2 (for g). (Or maybe the other way around?)

Beyond that you can try further alternative manipulation and application of the triangle inequality to see if you can isolate out that troublesome case.

Hmmm...just trying some expressions...
(f-L)(g-M) = fg -Lg -fM + MG... (f-L)(g+M)/2 + (f+L)(g-M)/2 = fg -LM ...? (f-L)(g-M + 2M)/2 < ?

Something there might be useful or hint at something useful... or maybe not. I haven't gone through the proof myself yet.
 
Let epsilon=1. Then there must exist a corresponding delta such that |g(x)-M|<1. How does this help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K