Limiting Deviation: Norms, Symbols & Names

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0xDEADBEEF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deviation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the lack of international norms for specifying maximum errors in measurement instruments, particularly in the context of German standards. The author advocates for using maximum error specifications over standard deviations due to their practicality in real-world applications. They highlight the absence of corresponding ISO norms and symbols for maximum errors, specifically referencing the German symbol "G" for "Grenze" or "Fehlergrenze." The conversation also touches on the use of Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) as a method for evaluating instrument performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measurement error concepts, including standard deviation and maximum error.
  • Familiarity with international standards, particularly ISO norms.
  • Knowledge of statistical methods, specifically Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA).
  • Awareness of terminology used in measurement science, including symbols for errors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research international norms for maximum error specifications in measurement instruments.
  • Explore the use of the symbol "G" for maximum error in German measurement standards.
  • Study Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) techniques and their applications in instrument performance evaluation.
  • Investigate literature on maximum accuracy error specifications, including examples from manufacturers like Honeywell.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and quality assurance professionals involved in measurement science, particularly those focused on instrument accuracy and error specification.

How should instrumentsl errors be specified?

  • Maximum error

    Votes: 2 100.0%
  • Standard deviations

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Some combination of the above

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
0xDEADBEEF
Messages
815
Reaction score
1
Long time no post...

I am very much disturbed after my research of measurement errors and corresponding norms, because I find so few results. There are mainly two ways to specify errors of measurement instruments. Standard deviation with its siblings and maximum error.

I am a great fan of the old German tradition to specify maximum errors only for measurement instruments. Specifying that some piece of equipment will have an error below x for all practical purposes when operated under the specified conditions is much easier to do quantitatively than statistical deviations and errors that depend on the measurement value and environmental fluctuations. Because in most cases the errors are far from being Gaussian. So you just add add all relevant maximum errors and don't care about independence.

But I couldn't find any norms about it. The relevant German ones don't have corresponding ISO norms. I couldn't even find a symbol for it. The German symbol is G for "Grenze" or "Fehlergrenze". I only get "uncertainties" and a number of k sigmas.

So after so much complaining my questions:
- Is there an international norm regarding the declaration of maximum errors.
- What symbol do you use for "maximum error" or "limiting deviation"
- If you have a better name for this and what do you call it? What is it called in your Physics books?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Generally speaking I would say "it depends." I've usually seen the "maximum accuracy error" specification as you've mentioned, usually defined in a +/- percentage value (example here: Honeywell Model 31 Force Transducer).

When qualifying the performance of a complex instrument or process, it might be prudent to use more advanced statistical methods e.g. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA): https://www.moresteam.com/toolbox/measurement-system-analysis.cfm

Gold standard MSA books: https://www.aiag.org/source/Orders/index.cfm?search=MSA-4
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
12K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K