Understanding Bohmian Mechanics of Instrumentalists

In summary, @Demystifier's paper, Bohmian Mechanics for Instrumentalists, is interesting and there is a danger of confirmation bias. @Demystifier and others would be a great source of input to challenge any confirmation bias.
  • #106
Lynch101 said:
Does the Legget-Garg inequality tell us anything about Bohmian Mechanics, or does it simply not apply?
The LG inequality is about temporal correlations. Some people (including @A. Neumaier) were arguing in the past that BM does not correctly reproduce the quantum mechanical temporal correlations. But it is wrong. The measurable temporal correlations in QM are the same as measurable temporal correlations in BM. To understand that, one has to take into account what happens with the wave function at the time of measurement. It gets entangled with the wave function of the detector, which is responsible for an effective (apparent) wave function "collapse". More details can be found in the book F. Laloe, "Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?", Appendix I.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lynch101 and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
Lynch101 said:
"'Created' seems to imply that a particle is not the effect of its antecdent state, while a particle that is 'destroyed' wouldn't be "the cause of the state that is to follow". Am I correct in that characterisation of the notions of 'create' and 'destroy'?

Of course, this would be perfectly in-keeping with the notion of an indeterministic interpretation but it would seem to require an incredibly 'extraordinary' explanation. Again, relating it back to the age-old question, how can a particle be created from absolutely nothing? How can something come from absolutely nothing? How can a particle then simply cease to have any properties whatseover?

Good points.
 
  • #108
physika said:
Good points.
No, they're not. See post #6.

(When responding to a post that was made quite some time ago, it's a good idea to read the thread first to see if others have already responded to it.)
 
  • #109
user30 said:
In physics it's that each state in a given physical world was always a fact and could never have been differently if you rewind the tape with the same initial conditions.

That is called, Fatalism, a " flavor" of determinism.

...without the need to have read subsequent posts

...
 
  • #110
user30 said:
Even in a timeless universe with no events unfolding, it would still be a complete mystery why things are correlated that show no causal connection.

all already written.

...
 

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
11
Replies
376
Views
10K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
15
Replies
491
Views
26K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
5
Replies
159
Views
10K
Back
Top