MHB Linear Algebra Conditions: Solving for ab≠1

Terry_Destefano
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6404
The answers is b) ab≠1, but I have no clue how to get to that answer... Can someone help me? :D
 

Attachments

  • wfusN4S.png
    wfusN4S.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 125
Physics news on Phys.org
foxsborisnaumo said:
The answers is b) ab≠1, but I have no clue how to get to that answer... Can someone help me? :D

One answer to this is that, in order that a system of linear equations have a unique solution is that the determinant of coefficient, here $$\left|\begin{array}{cc}1 & b \\ 2a & 2 \end{array}\right|= 2- 2ab$$ be non-zero. (This is the answer you got to your post of this question on another board.)

More fundamentally, what happens if you try to solve the equations? To solve x+ by= -1, 2ax+ 2y= 5, we might start by multiplying the first equation by 2, 2x+ 2by= -2. Multiply the second equation by b, 2abx+ 2by= 5b. Now, since both equations have "2by", subtracting one equation from the other (2- 2ab)x= -2- 5b. Finally, divide the both sides by 2- 2ab: x= (-2- 5b)/(2- 2ab). Given that value for x, we could put it into either of the two original equations to solve for y.

Under what conditions can we not do that? Every step above is easy to do for all values of a and b except "divide both sides by 2- 2ab". We cannot do that if 2- 2ab= 0 because we cannot divide by 0. There is a unique solution for all a or b except a and b so that 2- 2ab= 2(1- ab)= 0. That is the same as ab= 1. The given system of equations has a unique solution if and only if ab is not equal to 1.
 
Thanks HallsofIvy!
I put my question at many forums and even payed for homework help but you gave me the most detailed response.
 
foxsborisnaumo said:
Thanks HallsofIvy!
I put my question at many forums and even payed for homework help but you gave me the most detailed response.

There's no need to link to the commercial site you used. Thanks! :D
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
835
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K