MHB Linear algebra. Rank. linear independence.

caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space. Let $T$ be a linear transformation on $V$ with eigenvalue $0$. A vector $v \in V$ is

said to have rank $r > 0$ w.r.t eigenvalue $0$ if $T^rv=0$ but $T^{r-1}v\neq 0$. Let $x,y \in V$ be linearly independent and have

ranks $r_1$ and $r_2$ w.r.t eigenvalue $0$ respectively. Show that $\{x,Tx,\ldots ,T^{r_1-1}x,y,Ty,\ldots , T^{r_2-1}y \}$ is a

linearly independent set of vectors.

I can see that $\{ x, Tx, \ldots , T^{r_1-1}x \}$ are Linearly Independent, and $\{ y, Ty, \ldots, T^{r_2-1}y \}$ are linearly independent, but now I am stuck. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
caffeinemachine said:
Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space. Let $T$ be a linear transformation on $V$ with eigenvalue $0$. A vector $v \in V$ is

said to have rank $r > 0$ w.r.t eigenvalue $0$ if $T^rv=0$ but $T^{r-1}v\neq 0$. Let $x,y \in V$ be linearly independent and have

ranks $r_1$ and $r_2$ w.r.t eigenvalue $0$ respectively. Show that $\{x,Tx,\ldots ,T^{r_1-1}x,y,Ty,\ldots , T^{r_2-1}y \}$ is a

linearly independent set of vectors.

I can see that $\{ x, Tx, \ldots , T^{r_1-1}x \}$ are Linearly Independent, and $\{ y, Ty, \ldots, T^{r_2-1}y \}$ are linearly independent, but now I am stuck. Please help.
As stated, this result is clearly false. For example, given $x$ satisfying those conditions for some $r_1>1$, you could take $y=Tx$ (and $r_2 = r_1-1$).

For the result to be true, you need some extra conditions, such as requiring that neither $x$ nor $y$ is in the range of $T$, and that $r_1\ne r_2$. Then the generalised eigenspaces generated by $x$ and $y$ will correspond to different Jordan blocks of $T$ and will therefore be linearly independent.
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K