Linear Algebra - Subspaces proof

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 8K views
mattmns
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
5
Hello, just wondering if my proof is sufficient.

Here is the question from my book:

Show that the following sets of elements in R2 form subspaces:
(a) The set of all (x,y) such that x = y.
-------

So if we call this set W, then we must show the following:
(i) [tex]0 \in W[/tex]
(ii) if [tex]v,w \in W[/tex], then [tex]v+w \in W[/tex]
(iii) if [tex]c \in R[/tex] and [tex]v \in W[/tex] then [tex]cv \in W[/tex]

Pf:
(i) [tex]0 \in W[/tex] because we can take x = 0 = y
(ii) if [tex]v,w \in W[/tex] then [tex](v,v) \in W[/tex] and [tex](w,w) \in W[/tex] and [tex](v,v) + (w,w) = (v + w, v + w) \in W[/tex] so [tex]v+w \in W[/tex] because v + w = x = y = v + w
(iii) if [tex]c \in R[/tex] and [tex]v \in W[/tex], then [tex](v,v) \in W[/tex] and [tex]c(v,v) = (cv,cv) \in W[/tex] so [tex]cv \in W[/tex] because cv = x = y = cv
Therefore W is a subspace.

Does that look just fine? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yah, looks good to me.
 
No, that's not right, but the idea is correct. You state v is in W but then write the vector (v,v) is in W. The v in the brackets cannot be the v outside the brackets. You need to change that, v canont simultaneously be a vector in R^2 and elements of R.
 
Thanks matt, I think I am seeing what you are saying. So if I said V is in W, then (v,v) is in W, that would be correct? Because big V is not the same as little v. Thanks.
 
mattmns said:
Thanks matt, I think I am seeing what you are saying. So if I said V is in W, then (v,v) is in W, that would be correct? Because big V is not the same as little v. Thanks.
well, (v,v) is in W because of the definition of W, and is not deduced from V is in W. what you ought to say is if V in W then V=(v,v) for some v. there is no need to actually use V. W is closed under addition because (v,v)+(x,x)=(v+x,v+x).
 
Just for future reference, you can cut down the work for the proof for a subspace, simply by showing...

0 e W
cx+y e W, for any scalar c (depending on the field).