Linear Algebra - Use angles between vectors to find other vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding all unit vectors in R^3 that form specific angles with given vectors. The original poster presents a problem involving angles of pi/4 radians with vector Y = (1,0,1) and pi/3 radians with vector Z = (0,1,0).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the dot product to relate the angles and lengths of vectors. The original poster attempts to express the unit vector X in terms of its components and explores the implications of assuming its length is 1. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the factors used in the equations, particularly the presence of sqrt(2).

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding finding the values of x3 that ensure the unit length of vector X, but no consensus has been reached on the overall approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the requirement for X to be a unit vector, and participants are considering how to incorporate this condition alongside the angle constraints. The original poster expresses uncertainty about handling nonlinear constraints in their equations.

Heute
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find all the unit vectors X element of R^3 that make an angle of pi/4 radians with vector Y = (1,0,1) and an angle of pi/3 radians with vector Z = (0,1,0)


Homework Equations



For any two vectors X and Y element of R^n, the dot-prodict of X and Y is equals to the length of X times the length of Y times the cosine of the angle between X and Y. That is:

X*Y = cos(t)|x||y|

The Attempt at a Solution



let X = (x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})

We need X*Y = cos(\pi/4) |x| |y|
and X*Z = cos(\pi/3)|x||z|

We want the length of X, that is |x|, to be 1 so I'll assume that it is 1 for now (this could be a bad idea).

X*Y= x_{1} + x_{3} = srt(2)/2 * sqrt(2) = 1
X*Z = x_{2} = 1/2 * sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)/2

Solving for x_{1} and x_{2} in terms of x_{3} we get:

X = (1, 1/2, 0) + x_{3}(-1, 0, 1)

Problem: X is not a unit vector for all x_{3}, so we haven't really found a formula for "all unit vectors" which fulfill the initial requirements. This is where I'm stuck! I thought about including another variable for |x| in the restrictions and adding a further restriction that x_{1}^2 + x_{2}^2 + x_{3}^2 = 1, but I'm not sure how to handle such a nonlinear constraint!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heute said:

The Attempt at a Solution



let X = (x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})

We need X*Y = cos(\pi/4) |x| |y|
and X*Z = cos(\pi/3)|x||z|

We want the length of X, that is |x|, to be 1 so I'll assume that it is 1 for now (this could be a bad idea).

X*Y= x_{1} + x_{3} = srt(2)/2 * sqrt(2) = 1
X*Z = x_{2} = 1/2 * sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)/2
Why is there a factor of ##\sqrt{2}## in the equation for ##\vec{x}\cdot\vec{z}##?
 
Apologies! That sqrt(2) should be a 1 (the length of Z). I copied that sqrt(2) from the memory of another similar problem I was working on. I'll edit the original post!

This doesn't, however fundamentally change things. The question still remains.
 
Apparently, I can't edit the original post, so I'll re-write it here:


The Attempt at a Solution



let X = (x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})

We need X*Y = cos(\pi/4) |x| |y|
and X*Z = cos(\pi/3)|x||z|

We want the length of X, that is |x|, to be 1 so I'll assume that it is 1 for now (this could be a bad idea).

X*Y= x_{1} + x_{3} = srt(2)/2 * sqrt(2) = 1
X*Z = x_{2} = 1/2 * 1 = 1/2

Solving for x_{1} and x_{2} in terms of x_{3} we get:

X = (1, 1/2, 0) + x_{3}(-1, 0, 1)

Problem: X is not a unit vector for all x_{3}, so we haven't really found a formula for "all unit vectors" which fulfill the initial requirements. This is where I'm stuck! I thought about including another variable for |x| in the restrictions and adding a further restriction that x_{1}^2 + x_{2}^2 + x_{3}^2 = 1, but I'm not sure how to handle such a nonlinear constraint!
 
You just need to find the value or values of x3 for which X has unit length. Solve the equation X2=1 for x3.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K