Linear Approximation of F(x) at x=1.001

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the linear approximation of the composite function F(x) = f(g(h(x))) at the point x = 1.001, utilizing the values and derivatives of the functions f, g, and h at specific points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of linear approximation and the chain rule, with one participant attempting to derive F(x) through the composition of the functions based on their derivatives and values at given points. Questions are raised about the correctness of the derived expression and the process used to reach the final answer.

Discussion Status

Some participants express agreement with the general approach but highlight potential mistakes in the calculations. There is an ongoing examination of the derived expression for F(x) and its evaluation at x = 1.001, with suggestions to verify the calculations against known values.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the chain rule is relevant to the problem, and there is a focus on ensuring the accuracy of the expressions derived from the given values and derivatives of the functions.

mastermechanic
Messages
107
Reaction score
15
<Moved from a technical section and thus a template variation>

1-) Question:
Let f, g and h be differentiable everywhere functions with h(1) = 2 , h'(1) = - 3 , g(2) = -1 , g'(2) = 5 , f(-1) = 4 , f'(-1) = 7. Approximate the value of function F(x) = f(g(h(x))) at point x= 1.001

2-) My attempt: I think it's linear approximation question. I've generated the main functions by assuming their derivative as their slope.

If $$ h(1)=2 , h'(1) = -3 , (1,2) h(x) = -3x+5$$
If $$ g(2) = -1 , g'(2) = 5 , (2,-1) g(x) = 5x-11 $$
If $$ f(-1) = 4 , f'(-1) = 7 , (-1,4) f(x) = 7x+11$$

So $$ F(x) = f(g(h(x))) = [ 7[ 5 (-3x + 5) - 11 ] +11] $$

$$ F(x) = -105x + 109 $$
$$F(1.001) = 3.895 $$

Is it correct?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your method is correct, but you've made at least two mistakes. Try checking your expression for F(x) by calculating F(1) and comparing it to f(g(h(1))), which you know. Also, how did you get from your expression for F(x) to the final answer?
 
It looks like the question is set up for an application of the chain rule. Are you supposed to know the chain rule at this point or is this question preparation for introducing it.
 
phyzguy said:
I think your method is correct, but you've made at least two mistakes. Try checking your expression for F(x) by calculating F(1) and comparing it to f(g(h(1))), which you know. Also, how did you get from your expression for F(x) to the final answer?
I reached the final equation by putting each function to inside other one.
Thanks for your caution, I've realized that I made some multiplication mistake. When I fixed it , I got $$ F(x) = -105x + 109 $$ and if we put the x=1.001 value get 3.895 which totally make sense now, because as you said when I assumed x as 1 h(1) = 2 g(2) = -1 and f(-1) = 4 so it is too close.

Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K