Linear equations and homogeneity of space and time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Einstein's assertion regarding the homogeneity of space and time in relation to linear equations, specifically in the context of Lorentz transformations. It is established that if the transformation were non-linear, such as x'=(x-7)^2, it would imply a special significance to the point x=7, violating the principle of homogeneity. The participants agree that homogeneity requires that physical laws remain consistent across all points in spacetime, leading to the conclusion that linear equations, like x=x'-7, maintain this homogeneity by not singling out specific locations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with linear and non-linear equations
  • Knowledge of the principles of homogeneity in physics
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Poincaré transformations in physics
  • Explore the relationship between homogeneity and invariance under spacetime translations
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of linear versus non-linear equations
  • Learn about the physical significance of differentiating equations in the context of motion
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying relativity, as well as anyone interested in the foundational principles of spacetime and the mathematical structures that describe physical laws.

khil_phys
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Einstein, in his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", part 1, sec. 3, writes: "Primarily it is clear that on account of the property of homogeneity which we ascribe to time and space, the equations must be linear." What has the homogeneity of space and time to do with the degree of the equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, suppose that the Lorentz transformation had a form such as x'=(x-7)^2. Then there would be something special about the location x=7. But all that determines a Lorentz boost is the velocity v we choose, and there is no way that this choice of v would single out x=7 for special treatment. That would imply that x=7 was special not because of our choice of v but simply because x=7 had some special property of its own. This would violate the homogeneity of space.
 
I agree with you. But, after all x'=(x-7)2 is an equation in the second degree. I can single out x=7 as special through the equation x=x'-7 too, which is linear, and it violates the homogeneity of space.
 
Homogeneity means that the physics at one point in spacetime is the same as that at any other point. In particular, the length of an object should be independent of its position in an inertial frame. So the length measured by the observer ##O'## must not depend on the position of the object in the inertial frame of the observer ##O## either. This implies that the infinitesimal elements ##dx^{'\mu} = {\Lambda^\mu}_\nu dx^\nu,## where the ##{\Lambda^\mu}_\nu## are independent of the ##x^\mu##.

Integrating this expression leads to the Poincare transformations, which are indeed linear. This is not unusual, since in the modern viewpoint, we associate homogeneity with invariance under spacetime translations.
 
khil_phys said:
I agree with you. But, after all x'=(x-7)2 is an equation in the second degree. I can single out x=7 as special through the equation x=x'-7 too, which is linear, and it violates the homogeneity of space.

I would put it exactly the other way around. If x=x'-7 were *not* allowed, it would violate homogeneity.

x=x'-7 doesn't do anything special at x'=7. x'=7 just happens to be where it gives x=0 -- but nothing special happens at x=0.
 
Are you saying this because on differentiating the second degree equation with respect to time, we have x=7 as a root? On the other hand, differentiating the linear equation x'=x-7 would give us a constant velocity.
 
bcrowell said:
I would put it exactly the other way around. If x=x'-7 were *not* allowed, it would violate homogeneity.

x=x'-7 doesn't do anything special at x'=7. x'=7 just happens to be where it gives x=0 -- but nothing special happens at x=0.

I got it. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K