Linear independency of operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Operators
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the linear independence of operators and functionals, specifically examining whether certain linear operators from R² to R³ and linear functionals from R³ to R are linearly independent. Participants explore methods for testing independence through the formulation of equations and the implications of solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant sets up the equation aA + bB + cC = 0 to test the linear independence of operators A, B, and C, noting that a trivial solution indicates independence.
  • Another participant suggests that if a non-trivial solution exists for the equation, it can be expressed in a parametric form, indicating dependence.
  • A later reply confirms that if the equation holds for a specific input (0, 1) and leads to a non-trivial solution, the operators are dependent.
  • Another participant introduces a similar problem involving linear functionals and questions whether testing with basis vectors is sufficient to determine independence for all vectors.
  • This participant expresses confusion about the consistency of methods used for testing independence between the two different contexts (operators vs. functionals).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods for testing linear independence, particularly regarding the implications of plugging in specific vectors versus general vectors. The discussion reflects multiple competing views on the sufficiency of different approaches.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of the operators and functionals, as well as the dependence on specific vector choices for testing independence. The implications of solutions derived from specific inputs versus general cases remain unclear.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8
OK, I stumbled upon a problem, but I feel somehow stupid about writing the exact problem down, so I'll ask a more "general" question.

I have to see if three linear operators A, B and C from the vector space of all linear operators from R^2 to R^3 are linearly independent. The mappings are all known (i.e. A(x, y) = ... , etc.).

Well, I set up an equation aA + bB + cC = 0, or, more precise, (aA + bB + cC)(x, y) = 0(x, y), where a, b and c are scalars. This equation should hold for all ordered pairs (x, y) from R^2 in order for these operators to be equal. Now, this equation led to a system of three equations with three unknowns, a, b and c (of course, the coefficients of the system are terms involving linear combinations of x and y). Now, since this must hold for every (x, y) from R^2, my logic was to plug in any (x, y) and solve for a, b and c. If the solution is trivial, then the operators are independent.

Nevertheless, there is obviously something wrong with my logic, since, after plugging in, for example (x, y) = (0, 1), I obtain a solution in parametric form, i.e. there is no unique trivial solution!

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose (a',b',c') is a solution to (aB + bB + cC)(0, 1) = (0, 0, 0). Then so is (ta',tb',tc'); observe:

((ta')A + (tb')B + (tc')C)(0,1)
= (t(a'A) + t(b'B) + t(c'C))(0,1)
= t(a'A + b'B + c'C)(0,1)
= t(0,0,0) ... [since (a',b',c') is a sol'n]
= (0,0,0)

So in your situation, you've come up with the solutions being (ta',tb',tc') where t is a parameter. You found this after setting (x,y) = (0,1). This tells you that IF there is are non-trivial solutions to the equation aA + bB + cC = 0, they are of the form (ta',tb',tc') for some non-zero t. And it's clear that these are all solutions iff (a',b',c') is a solution. So compute:

(a'A + b'B + c'C)(1,0)

if you get (0,0,0), then you've found your non-trivial solution(s). If not, only the trivial solution exists.
 
AKG said:
Suppose (a',b',c') is a solution to (aB + bB + cC)(0, 1) = (0, 0, 0). Then so is (ta',tb',tc'); observe:

((ta')A + (tb')B + (tc')C)(0,1)
= (t(a'A) + t(b'B) + t(c'C))(0,1)
= t(a'A + b'B + c'C)(0,1)
= t(0,0,0) ... [since (a',b',c') is a sol'n]
= (0,0,0)

So in your situation, you've come up with the solutions being (ta',tb',tc') where t is a parameter. You found this after setting (x,y) = (0,1). This tells you that IF there is are non-trivial solutions to the equation aA + bB + cC = 0, they are of the form (ta',tb',tc') for some non-zero t. And it's clear that these are all solutions iff (a',b',c') is a solution. So compute:

(a'A + b'B + c'C)(1,0)

if you get (0,0,0), then you've found your non-trivial solution(s). If not, only the trivial solution exists.

AKG, thank you for your reply.

I seem to have "temporarily forgotten" that the set of all solutions to a homogenous system is a vector space. :rolleyes:

I did as you suggested, and I found out that the operators are dependent, since I arrived at (a'A + b'B + c'C)(1,0) = (0, 0, 0).
 
Well, a new dilemma is here.

I found an exercise which is similar and solved. It's, again, about "testing" the independency of three linear functionals (where all of them are well known and all are from R^3 --> R).

Anyway, at a point one obtains a(x1 - 2x2 + x3) + b(x1 + x2 + x3) + c(x1 - x2 - x3) = 0, for some scalars a, b, c, and this equation should hold for all x1, x2, x3 from R (of course, f1(x1, x2, x3) = x1 -2x2 + x3, etc.). Now, the solution says that we have to plug in (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0) and (0, 0, 1) into the equation in order to obtain a system of 3 equations with 3 unknowns which has a trivial solution a=b=c=0, so the functionals are independent.

This looks perfectly logical, but it doesn't seem to be in consistency with the upper posts (unless I'm missing something huge). Can it perhaps be that, if the equations hold for all the basis vectors from R^3, then they hold for all vectors from R^3, too? What is the exact reason why the solution looks like I said it looks? Could we have plugged in any other three linearly independent vectors in order to obtain a 3x3 system whose solution tells us about the dependency/independency of the given functionals?

Thanks in advance.

Edit: I'm sorry the thread looks so homework-ish, since this isn't a homework section.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
674
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K