Linear particle accelerator design

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the design differences between two types of linear particle accelerators, specifically regarding the spacing of accelerating plates. One design features increasing plate length and spacing for slower-moving charged particles, while the other maintains consistent spacing for particles already traveling at relativistic speeds. Superconducting RF cavities are typically employed for electrons in the hundreds of MeV to GeV range, where their speed approaches that of light, making spacing less critical. The relationship between frequency and wavelength in these cavities is influenced by the speed of light, necessitating precise design considerations. Overall, understanding these design principles is crucial for optimizing particle acceleration.
emoney
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a qustion about two types of accelerating designs.

In these types of design the plates get longer or spaced apart because the frequency of the RF power is constant but the particle is acclerated so it covers more distance in less time.
acc-linac-schema.png
The other type of design looks like this:
image037.png

2981_5.jpg


My question is, is why in these superconducting Rf accelerators that the units do not get place farther apart or grow in length as the beam go through.

What I am thinking is that the design with the plates increasing in spacing is for slow moving particle charged particles where acceleration is very large, and that the other design is for when the particles are already traveling very fast and acceleration very little so spacing is less important.

Is that right? or is there a different reason?
I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to double check if these are all standing wave structure or if one of them is a traveling wave structure. The rf frequency used can also be a determining factor here. In addition, are these linacs used at the very beginning of the acceleration (i.e. Such as at the photoinjector) or are they where the particle bunches are already relativistic?

There are a lot of details here that are missing.

BTW, topics on accelerator science normally belongs in the Classical Physics forum, since classical E&M is usually the main subject area involved, such as in this one.

Zz.
 
I moved the thread.
emoney said:
What I am thinking is that the design with the plates increasing in spacing is for slow moving particle charged particles where acceleration is very large, and that the other design is for when the particles are already traveling very fast and acceleration very little so spacing is less important.
Right.
The superconducting RF cavities are typically used for electrons in the hundreds of MeV to GeV range, where the difference to the speed of light is negligible. It has to be, because frequency and wavelength in those cavities are linked via the speed of light (with some corrections due to the shape of the cavities).
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K