Linearising the Geodesic Deviation Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the linearization of the geodesic deviation equation in a Newtonian context, focusing on the relationship between covariant and partial derivatives. The participant expresses confusion over the transition from the covariant derivative form to the partial derivative form, questioning the omission of Christoffel symbols in the linearization process. They also highlight a potential inconsistency in the equation structure, noting that the left-hand side has a single index while the right side has multiple indices. The participant suggests that the correct form should include the particle's 4-velocity to align the indices properly. Clarifying these points is essential for accurately applying the geodesic deviation equation in this approximation.
Xander314
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Write down the Newtonian approximation to the geodesic deviation equation for a family of geodesics. ##V^\mu## is the particle 4-velocity and ##Y^\mu## is the deviation vector.

Homework Equations


<br /> D = V^\mu\nabla_\mu \\<br /> V^\mu\approx(1,0,0,0) \\<br /> g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}+h_{\mu\nu}<br />[/B]
The geodesic deviation equation and the desired linearisation are
<br /> D^2 Y^\mu = R^\mu{}_{\rho\lambda\nu} \\<br /> \partial_t^2 Y^i = -\partial_i\partial_j\phi Y^j<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


Apologies if this is not the correct way to post in this subforum, but I'm not going to write up all of what I have so far as I don't think it's relevant to my question. My issue is with the left hand side, which with the approximation for the 4-velocity becomes
<br /> D^2 Y^\mu = V^\mu\nabla_\mu V^\nu\nabla_\nu Y^\mu = \nabla_t^2 Y^\mu<br />
Everywhere I have looked, the next step is to replace this by ##\partial_t^2 Y^\mu##, but I don't follow this logic. As far as I can see, the covariant and partial derivatives differ by Christoffel symbols containing terms O(h), which should enter into the linearisation. What am I missing? Is Y also O(h)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xander314 said:

Homework Statement


Write down the Newtonian approximation to the geodesic deviation equation for a family of geodesics. ##V^\mu## is the particle 4-velocity and ##Y^\mu## is the deviation vector.

Homework Equations


<br /> D = V^\mu\nabla_\mu \\<br /> V^\mu\approx(1,0,0,0) \\<br /> g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}+h_{\mu\nu}<br />[/B]
The geodesic deviation equation and the desired linearisation are
<br /> D^2 Y^\mu = R^\mu{}_{\rho\lambda\nu} \\<br /> \partial_t^2 Y^i = -\partial_i\partial_j\phi Y^j<br />

That equation D^2 Y^\mu = R^\mu{}_{\rho\lambda\nu} can't possibly be right, because the left-hand side has only one index, \mu, while the right side has indices \mu, \rho, \lambda, \nu. I think it's supposed to be something like:

D^2 Y^\mu = R^\mu{}_{\rho\lambda\nu} V^\rho V^\lambda Y^\nu
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K