MHB Linearly Dependent Vectors: Find h Value and Justify

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearly Vectors
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{311.1.7.11}$
ok I am going to do several of these till I get it...
Find the value(s) of h for which the vectors are linearly dependent. Justify
$\left[\begin{array}{rrrrrr}
2\\-2\\4
\end{array}\right],
\left[\begin{array}{rrrrrr}
4\\-6\\7
\end{array}\right],
\left[\begin{array}{rrrrrr}
-2\\2\\h
\end{array}\right]$
so the first step would be, I like the augment line
$\left[\begin{array}{rrr|r}
2&4&-2&0\\
-2&-6&2&0\\
4&7&h&0
\end{array}\right]$
EMH returned...
$\text{rref}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc}1&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\end{array} \right]$

$h$ disappeared :censored:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that we are looking for constants a, b, and c such that
[math]a \vec{v_1} + b \vec{v_2} + c \vec{v_3} = \vec{0}[/math]

So you are looking for values a, b, c, and h such that
[math]\left [ \begin{matrix} 2a + 4b - 2c \\ -2a - 6b + 2c \\ 4a + 7b + ch \end{matrix} \right ] = \left [ \begin{matrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ][/math]

-Dan
 
Do you know how to do the "row reduction" yourself?
Starting with
[math]\begin{bmatrix}2 & 4 & -2 & 0 \\ -2 & -6 & 2 & 0 \\ 4 & 7 & h & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/math]
I would (1) add the first row to the second row, (2) subtract twice the first row from the third row and (3) divide the first two by 2:
[math]\begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & h+ 4 & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/math]

Now, add the second row to the first row, divide the second row by -2, and then add this new second row to the third row:
[math]\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & h+ 4 & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/math]

Now, what your "EMH" did was divide the third row by h+4 and then add the new third row to the first row to get
[math]\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/math]
which, as you say, has no h!

But you are supposed to be SMARTER than some machine and recognize that you CAN'T divide by h+4 if h= -4 because then h+ 4= 0!
 
row reduction tends to be arithmetic torture
 
Would you prefer to use the determinant? Expanding on the third column,
$\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 2 & 4& -2\\ -2& -6 & 2 \\ 4 & 7 & h \end{array}\right|= -2\left|\begin{array}{cc}-2& -6 \\ 4 & 7\end{array}\right|- 2\left|\begin{array}{cc}2& 4 \\ 4& 7\end{array}\right|+ h\left|\begin{array}{cc}2& 4 \\ -2 & -6\end{array}\right|$= -2(10)- 2(-2)- 4h=-16- 4h.

In order that a= b= c= 0 NOT be the only solution (so that the vectors be dependent) the determinant must be 0: -16- 4h= 0 so 4h= -16 and h=-4 again.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K