Lipschitz Q: Show w/ Example & Derivative

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating Lipschitz continuity with an example and its relation to the derivative of a function. The original poster considers using the function f(x) = x² but expresses uncertainty about whether it meets the criteria related to the absolute value of the derivative.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the adequacy of using a single example to satisfy the problem's requirements, with some questioning the necessity of proving the property for all functions. There is a focus on understanding the implications of showing Lipschitz continuity for just one function versus a general case.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring the need for broader proof beyond a single example. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of generalization in the proof process, highlighting the distinction between personal understanding and formal requirements.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need to prove properties of a general function rather than relying solely on specific instances. This reflects the constraints of the homework question and the expectations for a comprehensive understanding.

JasMath33
Messages
21
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


upload_2016-7-5_10-31-39.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I will just have to show this by one example. I thought about using f(x) = x2 but I am not sure if this satisfies the last part dealing with the absolute value of the derivative. It is just the last part on which I am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JasMath33 said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 102885

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I will just have to show this by one example. I thought about using f(x) = x2 but I am not sure if this satisfies the last part dealing with the absolute value of the derivative. It is just the last part on which I am stuck.

Just showing it for one example will not satisfy the requirements of the question.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Just showing it for one example will not satisfy the requirements of the question.
But I don't need to prove it for all functions. Why would not showing one work?
 
JasMath33 said:
But I don't need to prove it for all functions. Why would not showing one work?

You have mis-read the question. It hypothesized some properties of an uspecfied, general function ##f(x)## and asked you to prove something else about that function. Showing it for just one function alone won't work; how do you know it would be true for some other function that you did not use?

Of course, showing it for one function privately (for your own background use only) may help you to develop the needed intuition about the problem, thus allowing you to extend the ideas to the general case, but doing the general case is absolutely required.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K