Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around identifying and compiling a list of authoritative and comprehensive textbooks in various STEM fields, particularly physics. Participants share their opinions on which books qualify as "bibles" in their respective subjects, including general physics, classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and more. The scope includes theoretical, applied, and historical perspectives on these texts.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" as a comprehensive resource for general physics.
- For classical mechanics, "Classical Mechanics" by H. Goldstein et al. is proposed as a standard text.
- In classical electromagnetism, J.D. Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" is mentioned as a key reference.
- Participants express uncertainty about which quantum mechanics textbook should be considered a bible, with suggestions including Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" and Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics." However, some argue these may not meet the criteria of being comprehensive or intellectually heavy.
- Books like "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang and "The Quantum Theory of Fields" by Weinberg are also highlighted for their significance in quantum information and quantum field theory, respectively.
- Several participants mention additional texts in solid state physics, medical physiology, and optics, indicating a broad interest in various subfields.
- There is discussion about the inclusion of handbooks and other reference materials, with some participants suggesting titles like Gradshteyn and Ryzhik for integrals.
- Some participants question the definition of "general physics" and its overlap with other subjects like electromagnetism and thermodynamics.
- Concerns are raised about the age and respectability of certain texts, with references to how perceptions of these books may change over time.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on which books qualify as "bibles" in their respective fields, with multiple competing views and suggestions presented throughout the discussion. There is ongoing debate about the criteria for selection and the relevance of various texts.
Contextual Notes
Some participants express limitations in their expertise regarding certain fields, which may affect their recommendations. Additionally, the discussion reveals a dependence on subjective definitions of what constitutes a "bible" in each subject area.