MHB Local Extrema of f(x,y)=3sin x sin y

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Find the local maximum and minimum values and saddle point(s) of the function. If you have three-dimensional g?

Find the local maximum and minimum values and saddle point(s) of the function. If you have three-dimensional graphing software, graph the function with a domain and viewpoint that reveal all the important aspects of the function. (Enter your answers as a comma-separated list. If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.)

f(x, y) = 3 sin x sin y, −π < x < π, −π < y < π

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello pheobee,

We are given the function:

$$f(x,y)=3\sin(x)\sin(y)$$ where $-\pi<x,y<\pi$.

First, to find the critical points, we must solve the simultaneous system:

$$f_x(x,y)=3\cos(x)\sin(y)=0$$

$$f_y(x,y)=3\sin(x)\cos(y)=0$$

This implies by addition:

$$\sin(x)\cos(y)+\cos(x)\sin(y)=\sin(x+y)=0$$

And by subtraction:

$$\sin(x)\cos(y)-\cos(x)\sin(y)=\sin(x-y)=0$$

Hence, we may state:

$$x\pm y=k\pi$$

Now, given the first partials, and the stated domains, we obtain from this the following critical points:

$$(x,y)=\left(-\frac{\pi}{2},-\frac{\pi}{2} \right),\,\left(-\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2} \right),\,(0,0),\,\left(\frac{\pi}{2},-\frac{\pi}{2} \right),\,\left(\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2} \right)$$

Next, we may use the second partials test to determine the nature of the potential extrema associated with these 5 critical points.

First, we compute:

$$f_{xx}(x,y)=-3\sin(x)\sin(y)$$

$$f_{yy}(x,y)=-3\sin(x)\sin(y)$$

$$f_{xy}(x,y)=3\cos(x)\cos(y)$$

And we define:

$$D(x,y)\equiv f_{xx}(x,y)f_{yy}(x,y)-\left(f_{xy}(x,y) \right)^2$$

Using our second partials, we then find:

$$D(x,y)=9\left(\sin^2(x)\sin^2(y)-\cos^2(x)\cos^2(y) \right)$$

So now, we analyze the critical points:

1.) $$(x,y)=\left(-\frac{\pi}{2},-\frac{\pi}{2} \right)$$

$$D(x,y)=9>0$$

$$f_{xx}(x,y)=-3<0$$

We conclude this point is at a relative maximum.

The value of the function at this point is:

$$f(x,y)=3$$

2.) $$(x,y)=\left(-\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2} \right)$$

$$D(x,y)=9>0$$

$$f_{xx}(x,y)=3>0$$

We conclude this point is at a relative minimum.

The value of the function at this point is:

$$f(x,y)=-3$$

3.) $$(x,y)=(0,0)$$

$$D(x,y)=-9<0$$

We conclude this point is not at an extremum (saddle point).

The value of the function at this point is:

$$f(x,y)=0$$

4.) $$(x,y)=\left(\frac{\pi}{2},-\frac{\pi}{2} \right)$$

$$D(x,y)=9>0$$

$$f_{xx}(x,y)=3>0$$

We conclude this point is at a relative minimum.

The value of the function at this point is:

$$f(x,y)=-3$$

5.) $$(x,y)=\left(\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2} \right)$$

$$D(x,y)=9>0$$

$$f_{xx}(x,y)=-3<0$$

We conclude this point is at a relative maximum.

The value of the function at this point is:

$$f(x,y)=3$$

And so we may conclude:

$$f_{\min}=-3$$

$$f_{\max}=3$$

Here is a plot of the given function on the stated domain, showing all 5 points:

View attachment 2018

Here is a link to the program I used to plot the function:

z=3sin(x)sin(y) where x=-pi to pi,y=-pi to pi - Wolfram|Alpha
 

Attachments

  • pheobee.jpg
    pheobee.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 122
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top