Local measurements on an entangled pair. (My understanding)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the measurement of entangled particles in a Bell state, specifically |B00> = cos(a)|00> + sin(a)|11>. The participants detail the process of local measurements on entangled particles, concluding that measuring one particle at location w provides 100% certainty about the state of the other particle at location q. After measurement, the entangled state decoheres, meaning subsequent measurements on either particle do not influence the other. Additionally, the discussion confirms that it is possible to experimentally obtain the |B00> state by applying a phase shift of π/2 radians to the second qubit after a CNOT gate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bell states and quantum entanglement
  • Familiarity with tensor products in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of projective measurements and identity operators
  • Experience with quantum gates, specifically Hadamard and CNOT gates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of quantum decoherence in entangled systems
  • Learn about the Hadamard gate and its role in creating superposition states
  • Explore the concept of phase shifts in quantum computing
  • Investigate experimental setups for generating specific Bell states
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum computing, and students studying quantum mechanics who are interested in the properties and measurements of entangled states.

ouacc
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Say we have a BELL state |B00> = cos(a) |00>+ sin(a) |11>

then for a (just one) pair of entangled particles, we keep one on location q, the other one in location w; the one in q forms a system Q, the one in w forms W. ( 'x' in a function like |v> x |w> indicates a tensor product). Since they are entangled, they form a joint system QW, according to some tensor operations.

Define, on both systems, a projector : M0= |0><0|, M1=|1><1|. (they satisfy M0*M0+M1*M1= I)

and we use a projective measurement: Pm = Iq x (|Mm) = Iq x (|m><m|) (Iq is the identity operator on Q. m=0 or 1, is the outcome from M0 and M1, respectively), on the joint state |B00>



What is the result?

Here are my answers:
Conclusion (0)
Put it in plain English, the measurement Pm (m=0 and1) is to measure the particle in W along 0-1 axis. And this is done at location w locally.

Conclusion (1)
at location w, we know if the outcome is 0, then the particle in Q is in 0, too. with 100% certainty. (outcome 1 means the same)
After the measurement, if we measure the particle in q(the un-measured particle), say if we get Q=|0>, we know that the particle in W(the previously measured one) is 0, too, with 100% certainty.

Conclusion (2)
For the measured pair, after the measurement, they are NOT entangled any more. Q and M are decoherenced. Any later measurements on the particle in Q has no influence on the particle in W, and vise verse.

SUMMARY:
There are two possible outcomes: (ALL knowledge is at q locally, w would not know these, unless the information is sent from q to w via a classical channel)
if we find the particle at w is |0>, (that is m=0).
then we know that after the measurement, Q is in |0>, W is in |0> and the probability of this happening is cos(a)^2;
if we find the particle at w is |1>, (that is m=1)
then we know that after the measurement, Q is in |1>, W is in |1> and the probability of this happening is sin(a)^2;


Are the conclusions right or wrong?

Thanks



BTW, is it possible to get |B00> experimentally? I am thinking take |00>, use Hadamard gate to get (|0>+|1>)/sqrt2, then use CNOT to produce (|00>+|11>)/sqrt2. but I get other Bell states, ie. (|01>-|10>)/sqrt2 or (|01>+|10>)/sqrt2. Is is possible to get ONLY |B00>?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is possible to get only |B00> experimentally. To do this, you need to apply a phase shift of pi/2 radians to the second qubit after applying the CNOT gate. This will produce the state (cos(a)|00> + sin(a)|11>).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K