Lock-in amplifier driving me crazy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on issues encountered while measuring the phase of a signal using an SR830 lock-in amplifier. The user reports that fluctuations in the amplitude of the input signal, despite a stable reference signal (50/50 square wave), result in a phase measurement shift of approximately 2 degrees. Potential causes for this discrepancy include the method of amplitude adjustment and the presence of an unintended weaker signal at the same frequency. The user is utilizing a micro-controller as the oscillator reference, which has been verified against the amplifier's internal function generator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lock-in amplifiers, specifically the SR830 model.
  • Knowledge of phase measurement techniques and their relationship to amplitude stability.
  • Familiarity with signal processing concepts, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • Experience with micro-controller applications in signal generation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the effects of amplitude fluctuations on phase measurements in lock-in amplifiers.
  • Explore methods to isolate and filter out unwanted signals in phase measurement setups.
  • Learn about the characteristics and performance of micro-controller oscillators for low-frequency applications.
  • Research troubleshooting techniques for phase measurement discrepancies in lock-in amplifiers.
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in precision phase measurement and signal analysis using lock-in amplifiers.

Topher925
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
7
I have a project where I'm measuring the phase of a signal compared to a signal reference using an SR830 lock-in amplifier. My problem is that the amplitude of the input signal periodically changes over time and this is causing a false measurement in the phase of the input signal. I can't figure out what would cause it as the phase measurement should be constant and independent of amplitude, should it not? Keep in mind that this signal has a very good SNR.

The reference signal is a constant amplitude and frequency 50/50 square wave. It doesn't matter what filtering settings I have, if the amplitude of the input signal decreases by 50% the phase measurement will change by roughly 2 degrees or so. What is going on?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the amplitude is unstable, why are you so sure that the phase of your input signal is stable within 2 deg?
 
Topher925 said:
The reference signal is a constant amplitude and frequency 50/50 square wave. It doesn't matter what filtering settings I have, if the amplitude of the input signal decreases by 50% the phase measurement will change by roughly 2 degrees or so. What is going on?
Perhaps the method you are using to alter the amplitude (e.g., potentiometer) is also causing a change in phase? Maybe you are inadvertently changing the duty cycle, though one would expect the detector to be immune to this.

You will just have to do more testing to determine the basis for the apparent phase change.
 
What type of oscillator is your reference? I had a similar problem with purchased, ovenized crystal oscillators at 3 MHz. Our circuit compared the frequency of two such oscillators to detect long term drift. Like you, when the signal fluctuated in amplitude, we detected a shift in frequency. Since our oscillators were purchased, we simply sent them back to the manufacturer as defective to be replaced.
 
I know that the phase is stable because I can measure it using an oscilloscope. However, I think I may have found the source of the problem, a second weaker signal (same frequency) mixed in with signal I'm trying to measure. I'm still investigating to see if this is the actual cause but given the magnitude of the phase shift I don't believe it is.

I'm actually just using a micro-controller as an oscillator reference. The signals I'm working with are rather low frequency (50-200Hz) and the uC provides enough accuracy for me. I've checked the uC against the internal function generator of the amplifier though and its definitely not the problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K